They've certainly blocked their share of telecommunication, retail, and airline industry merges — but after allowing the acquisition of Activision Blizzard by Microsoft, I wonder if its all bark and no bite.
2,021 karma · joined November 15, 2012
They've certainly blocked their share of telecommunication, retail, and airline industry merges — but after allowing the acquisition of Activision Blizzard by Microsoft, I wonder if its all bark and no bite.
There are probably a dozen reasons why something like this might have occurred, and not giving the vendors a free pass, but assuming that a more expensive vendor would do a better job with security and reviews is just as likely to be a mistaken belief.
If a project is too expensive for a client to do well, they should not be doing that work in the first place.
(If you are in a position to build spamming infrastructure, you are certainly capable of setting automating email accounts for the purpose of unflagging spam.)
Turns out community-building is really not a lucrative business, and beyond in-app/service purchases by some dedicated users, you are ultimately reliant on advertising as the largest and sole contributor to your customer lifetime value calculations.
It is very easy for an independent group to create adjacent apps on your service (i.e. Apollo) as they are separate from the economic realities of your business. i.e. Reddit needs to increase ad revenue, and may not priority the same features that Apollo does. Apollo delivered its service at someone's own personal expense (both time and money.) How can a company compete with something being done for free when they have to pay staff and other capital?
But this is the cycle of communities and, like Digg before it, and forums before that, there might be something new and engaging to sway a majority of users to leave. We're already seeing Reddit be aged-out with Discord... So if anything, people might just move there.
Really, its not a technology problem -- its a business problem.
I would assume its a number of regulatory and supply-chain factors — but also — they'll charge what they think they can get in the market, and the more a product is considered a luxury purchase, the more they'll up-the-price.
For instance, I purchased a MBP in 2018 in the UK and it was considerably cheaper than the same product purchased in AU. I just had the keyboard customised to use the AU keyboard (wasn't a huge expense) instead of the default UK/EU keyboard layout.
Tough ask, but if you are in Poland, could you exchange to Euro and purchase the product in a neighbouring country?
I've always worked in the services industry, and starting to see the same patterns before the agency lay-offs begin in the most established firms.
I think any organisation whose either dependant on public sector — or conversely, trying to scale with an operating loss, is in for a shock by year's end.
From my own reading, it looks like Japan already had specific provisions which allowed "data mining" to occur without copyright violation, and that this interpretation just extends machine-learning to be a data-mining activity.
If so, that's an interesting moral argument as I wholly believe that "data mining" (and for that matter, scraping) should be an allowable activity to avoid copyright becoming an overly cumbersome or destructive tool, but at the same time, dislike AI being used to imitate a particular artist's works.
I think Nintendo is unique in that, when selling a console, your customers at least know they'll get a few good exclusive games out of it.
(But like most, I wish they did more with their IPs)
Does such things invalidate the points made in the article? No. But it helps me judge the level of scrutiny I need to apply.
Wix/Squarespace, at least last time I checked, treated e-commerce as an add-on to their core service (building websites.) Square is a payment processor which with an e-commerce add-on, but is heavily templated.
As a small-business Shopify merchant, I would appreciate more competition in the market.
It would be difficult for a IT department to guarantee, for sure without replacing the internals of the device, that the device doesn't contain sensitive information. Probably easier from an inventory and IT security perspective to just capture every device than try and coordinate with individuals to reformat, etc.
(for the same reason, some companies outright destroy old devices instead of reselling.)
Everyone just consents anyway...
Which is not to say AI is going away, rather, every Silicon Valley tech company that is chasing this holy grail of miraculous untapped revenue are going to burn whatever cash/stock price they have left in the process...
(Dropbox and Meta feel particluarly at risk.)
Twice I've had to spend hours manually resetting/renabling my 2FA after a phone was damaged, and sans buying a new screen just to get a backup of the phone, there aren't many other options.
(Similarly, this was the time I learnt that the UK gov does not issue backup codes for their 2FA and you just have to spend 45 mins on hold to have them reset it for you.)
Honestly, as much as I disliked the CSS-in-JSS trend, it did solve a reasonable problem with React — one which Vue and others had solved with their SPC.
It feels like ducktape on top of ducktape...
Whilst a bank specialising in agri-financing could still make the same mistakes that SVB did, any involvement by the government would be recognising the unique characteristics of the agricultural sector and the broader impact to the nation should farm's fail. People need to eat.
That said, I do think there's an anti-Silicon-Valley sentiment in pop-culture (but I'd be wise not to extend that sentiment to the Federal government.) The sense is that this is a "rightful comeuppance," but its also hard to argue that is not deserved given the way in which the organisation got itself in this issue in the first place.
.co is a suitable alternative, if that were available?