2,021 karma · joined November 15, 2012
I remember liking this a lot when the design was first released, especially with the chaos of what would become known as the "Frutiger Aero" aesthetic period. It demonstrated just how fragmented Microsoft's brand had become, and how little visual consistency across their products and UI there was.
But looking again a decade later, I do not believe the "slate" would've stood the test of time. It's hard to make timeless brands, and often brands just make large shifts counter to the current direction, people follow suit, and it becomes outdated quickly. I'm not sure what Microsoft is doing now is much better than where we were 10 years ago, but I do think the simple four squares "Windows" adaption is a nice place to end up.
"Moralism" is a trap — it somehow argues that equal rights and faireness for women against sexual assualt, or people of colour from physical abuse, et al. are subjective issues. And that some degree of sexual assault, some degree of physical abuse, is and should be acceptable and any attempts to prevent it are just morals run amok.
It's not "aggressively performative moralism," this is just another rich man angry that all his wealth and power doesn't award him protection and admiration against the proletariat.
This is fascinating and raises some interesting questions about where the liability starts and stops i.e. is "trending/top right now/posts from following" the same as a tailored algorithm per user? Does Amazon become culpable for products on their marketplace? etc.
For good or for bad, this century's Silicon Valley was built on Section 230 and I don't foresee it disappearing any time soon. If anything, I suspect it will be supported by future/refined by legislation instead of removed. No one wants to be the person who legisliate away all online services...
But it’s a good question — the cycle is getting faster and faster. We're barely out of the dip on one hype-cycle before the next starts. I think the cycle stops after AI and things will get very tough for many organisations... at least for a little while. Many many more layoffs to come.
(I'm not sure whether Cloud was ever "hype," or if the hype was more "Big Data", but both have graduated into "just a thing everyone does now." Neither topic is going away...)
Take a Google L4 - $280K US, $190K UK, $160K DE.
But when you include the regulatory protections and benefits, the differences in living standards, etc. the US salary is probably still higher but these salaries are certainly nothing to balk at.
If the corporation is successful, whatever you think is not working is not important enough to stop what is working. Identifying and understanding how the corporation works is the first step, then determine how you can make that work for your own goals is the second. Conversely, establish your goals, and then evaluate if the corporation works towards them.
There are many frameworks/techniques for goal-setting and resolution which may be helpful, and if you can't accomplish that goal within your environment, change environments.
This kind of nitpicking is what the Kvetching Order avoids.
Otherwise, parody and criticism using AI would be limited.
My assumption is that the issue was not about automation/scraping, but rather, the way in which booking.com engaged in scraping amounted to some kind of fraud.
From a non-tech business perspective, I expect the interest in GenAI to decline by years end. It's just not materialising the value stakeholders are expecting to see for the exorbitant investment.
If you've visited pre-Covid, you'll immediately sense it too. There's still exceptional restaurants and bars, old and new alike, but struggling with fewer customers and more uncertain outlook.
On the flip side, I'm excited to see how the influx of a new generations of HK/Cantonese culture is going to change the London.