nkkollaw

Seems like a good course of action..?

Ha! That's neat.

I think it's helpful when if you open an empty dashboard, there is an example that uses all the features that you can play with.

I logged out because I couldn't really gauge the product without doing a lot of work.

Zenkit does what I'm talking about pretty well, if you're interested in this pattern.

It would be nice to have a sample table just to see how it works :-/

Looks great, though!

Aren't we saying the same thing..?

Not to me, what I got from the article is that most people can't use basic functionality that macOS hides by default.

The vast majority will not learn that ctrl + click does right-click, and that you can enable scrollbars again to actually see if there is more content to view.

Maybe he's not.

Also, if he's not it kind of proves the point of the article.

macOS is bad in terms of discoverability, but iOS or whatever they call it nowadays is ridiculous.

I have a brand-new iPhone I bought for testing websites, and I use a beat-up Motorola just because iOS is so frustrating to use.

Apple needs some design lessons, Microsoft has been doing such a great job with Surface devices that if they could make Windows just a tiny bit better people I bet a huge percentage will switch.

I literally have no idea what you're talking about.

Whatever you say, though.

This has nothing to do with what I said.

The web mirrors people.

How do you stop people from behaving like they do..? And why would you want to? Who should decide how people should behave (beyond established laws, of course)?

If people don't do something illegal that should be reported, they're being people. You have nice people, assholes, politically correct, politically incorrect, etc.

I thought that Mark Zuckerberg would be pretty aligned with Soro's point of view.

What does Soros not like about Mark Zuckerberg?

They did innovate with the butterfly keyboard, LOL!

This is exactly how it is.

Unfortunately, it seems to me that new devs have to always bw kept entertained and know/care very little about the business, and would rather make the company tank and have fun experimenting and move on, than get the job done.

Maybe I'm getting old.

Social studies degree..?

A lot of guesswork and generalization, right there.

I'm well aware of that, but now women can choose, and don't choose that.

What is your point?

I know, I just find it completely nuts.

Not really. The article is not stating the opposite.

Maybe.

Aren't there laws that prevent discrimination on gender and race pretty much in every first-world country? That would make it illegal to pay a woman less for the same job.

If you consider jobs where the title is the same but the professional works B2B, maybe women are less likely to ask for a better pay? That's why pink razors cost more, after all.

Female soccer players make less money because less people watch and there is less money, same thing for BBC journalists who demanded the same pay even though they got 10% share compared to their male colleague.

There are so many variables...

Women tend to choose jobs that pay less.

They're on average more interested in people, so they tend to choose to become nurses, teachers, etc., while men are interested in things and become software developers, engineers, etc.

I have no idea why income HAS TO be distributed equally. Unless you want to force women to become software developers..? But why.

I agree.

I find many comments on this thread pretty despicable.

Doesn't it seem a little insensitive to experiment on human beings..?

Given China's complete disregard for human life, I don't find it odd that they're the ones doing it, but we should not praise the effort.

Ceasing to be Japan would equal to have the culture be extinct so it's obviously not a solution.

Even if it wasn't (like you seem to argue), I would rather realize than in 10 years many jobs will be automated, so you won't need as much manual labor and Japanese will be just fine.

Netflix's UI is probably one of the worst I've ever used.

Horizontal browsing on desktop (or even mobile for that matter), are you kidding!?

Mouseover will completely change the layout, etc. etc.

Just very bad in general.

But then it wouldn't be Japan anymore...

I don't think it would be easy to push the switch to management: "We'd like to rewrite our React Native up to use Hippy..."

Ha! You're right. Thanks.

So true.

I used to be an iPhone user for many years until iPhone 5. My Android phone broke and even though I also own an iPhone 6 for testing, it was so frustrating to use that I'm using my Android tablet as a phone until I fix my actual phone.

iOS is just stupid. You have to memorize all these gestures for no reason. No discoverability, I bet most people don't know about 80% of all available gestures. To go back to the previous screen I have to press firmly, then swipe—but all the way to the right, or if I stop I trigger overview mode or whatever is called.

macOS suffers the same problem, but to a lesser extend.

Unfortunately, Johnny Hive has completely lost it. He's been obsessed with out things _look_ instead of how people are going to use them—and that's why people keep hitting his glass walls at Apple's HQ. Steve Jobs kept design at bay and insured a mix of beauty and usability. Now that he's gone you can tell that products got worse and worse in terms of usability (but 1.2 millimiters thinner, and so beautiful).

Maybe with Hives gone things will improve. The MacBook Pro 16 is a step forward (besides ports).

LOL, per capita.

How is that metric useful in any way, besides deceiving people and accuse other countries of being the bad guys?

It's industry which pollutes, not people. That's why it's so pointless to blame plastic straws and other silly things like that.

Maybe if we stopped buying things from communist China things would go better.