217 karma · joined August 13, 2020
Open access does not mean Creative Commons license (CC-BY, or CC-BY-NC-ND).
Jan 1 2026, all ACM publications will be open access, but not all will be creative commons.
Per an email I received on April 11th, 2025 from Scott Delman:
“Thank you for your email. All ACM published papers in the ACM DL will be made freely available. All articles published after January 1, 2026 will be governed by a Creative Commons license (either CC-BY or CC-BY-NC-ND), but ACM will not be retroactively assigning CC licenses to the entire archive of ~800K ACM published papers.”
This is unfortunate, in my opinion, because a lot of the foundational computer science papers fall into that category.
#FreeAlanTuring
Not making any sort of ethical statement, just interesting that rust keeps eating the python and JS tooling worlds.
> "How could Substack improve this situation for technical writers?"
They don’t care about (technical) writers. All they care about is building a TikTok clone to “drive discoverability” and make the attention-metrics go up. Chris Best is memeing about it on his own platform. Very gross.
Worked well on iOS Safari. Installed as PWA and everything. Managed to keep my attention for 5 levels. Nice work.
Of course writing is important. Writing free-hand on paper is beautiful. But so are the ideas, and the organization of the writing, and the style, and the plot and the characters.
Of course playing instruments is important, but I'm reminded of the Rick Rubin interview where he talks about how he's not a musician, and he doesn't know how to do any real technical music production.
One of my favorite ramblings on this is Wendell Berry's essay on "Why I Am not Going To Buy A Computer".
I'm just saying that there's an obviously bad way to let this tool have an impact on you, and there's a way to use it that won't ruin you.
It's important to be vigilant, and not to abuse GPT-4 and, i.e., replace all of your own writing with AI.
It's just a tool.
I like comparing it to something like quizlet (online flash cards), which can be a great study tool, but which people will also misuse and abuse. Instead of studying and taking the online quizzes, people will often just find the right quizlet which has all of the answers to the online quiz. People who are honest will actually learn the material, and the cheaters suffer.
I think people who misuse ChatGPT will become lazier, worse writers. But using the tool in an honest way will improve even an already talented writers work.
Just my 2 cents.
Monthly support: https://buy.stripe.com/5kA5kn2jd8XV39m144
One time support: https://buy.stripe.com/00gaEH3nhdebfW83cd
I write it usually in the afternoon or evening, so it's fun for me to think of things throughout the day or jot them down as a prompt and crank out the 500 words later in the day.
I think that this is about as secure as it could be beyond letting users generate and store their own encryption keys.
https://web.stanford.edu/~learnest/
http://web.stanford.edu/~learnest/bucket/
In a section headed by an anime girl, he claims to have, "figured out when and how a bunch of other fantasies got into our DNA and will shortly post an article on this web site that will explain how that happened, why it is causing modern humans to make billions of bad decisions each day, and how we and our descendants are likely to be wiped out soon unless we begin dealing with this problem in a rational way."
Then there's a weird picture of his face, which is how he thinks he'll look in 2043, when "he plans to croak at age 112".
On his bucket list page,
"My choice as a troublemaker will be to get shot in the back while running away from an jealous husband in May 2043".
Very weird stuff.