1,621 karma · joined August 12, 2009
" ... um, they're a private company. ..."
Screeeeeeech! http://www.google.com/finance?q=goog
[comments]
In addition to, not instead of. (And why not just allow it anywhere in the terms?)
I like seeing that my previous search was a ! search in my ff search bar. If it's a long search term I wouldn't see it at the end.
So is my life.
I deleted today. I'm not looking for a replacement, I already have email. My email privacy settings haven't changed in twenty years. Oh, wait -- I don't have privacy settings. It's just "private."
I like the idea. A lot. I would want an updating history of immutable canonical versions of a story, to reduce the re-writing of history that the internet makes relatively easy.
But I wouldn't want Facebook to actually be the repository of objects.
Edit: added second sentence.
Besides your options 1-5, think about things that are wrong or lacking in the world, and work on fixing some of them. That might require code, but most problems don't. Even problems that do require code are not saved by the code, they're saved by recognizing the problem and doing anything at all that's effective. Coders don't save the world; deployers of code and other resources save the world.
Your 1, 2 and 5 will build your chops, whether the first focus of those efforts are world changing or not. You also might benefit by working with someone who has a vision and has figured out how to execute on it.
If you take away the implied requirement that 1, 2 and 5 need to be code-focused, your first efforts might build chops and allow you to focus on problems rather than solutions in search of problems.
I'm not saying you shouldn't code, just open your mind.
This is because all other parts of the spacecraft appear to be functioning fine."
The display on my car radio no longer works, but the rest of the car appears to be functioning fine.
Film at 11.
"TextMate¶
Currently, TextMate support in IPython is broken. It used to work well, but the code has been moved to IPython.quarantine until it is updated.
vim configuration¶
Currently, vim support in IPython is broken. Like the TextMate code, the vim support code has been moved to IPython.quarantine until it is updated."
I tried vim in ipython, it worked in a very simple test: define a function, :wq and run the function. Was able to get back to the same edit because ipython reports the /tmp file name after the editor returns. Dunno what's broken.
Fallback: you can use ipython, python or anything else as the argument to ScreenShell in vim.
I imagine zip codes are useful for auto-filling/formatting city information.
Shipping account software?
The guy was looking for exercises.
You can implement the exercises in whatever language you're learning. Python, for example.
The C Programming Language, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_C_Programming_Language
The Elements of Programming Style, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Elements_of_Programming_Sty...
Writing Efficient Programs, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Bentley
Programming Pearls, http://netlib.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/pearls/
The UNIX Programming Environment, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_UNIX_Programming_Environmen...
And, er, Learning Python, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learning_Python
Rally and programming have lots of chances to go off into the weeds or get off course.
Or a foreign minor-power with delusions of super.
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1319054
The idea is that a network is more valuable the more connections there are in the network. Think of the difference between two new people added to the end of a line connected front to back, and two new people added by connecting them to everyone already there, who are also connected all to each other. The latter is more like a social network than the former.
...
"Both OneSocialWeb and Appleseed share the same problem: getting enough users to make users want to sign up — the so-called network effect where a network gets exponentially more useful as it gets bigger. (Think of the fax machine as an example — two fax machines in the world aren’t very useful, but your fax machine becomes much more useful when there are 1,000 of them, and even more valuable when there are 10 million.)"
...
"Users don’t have to choose to stop using Facebook or Twitter and will be able use the Diaspora client to use those all those services in one place — much like Friendfeed currently does. But when Diaspora knows that the person you are trying to communicate with also has Diaspora, it will use peer-to-peer, encrypted methods to send that message. And as more and more people start using the free software, they’ll slowly find themselves weaned from for-profit services, according to Moglen."
I think if the various social networks coming up interoperated, on some significant set of features, it would be good for all of them and all of us.
If service A has Ua users then the value of A is Ua^2 (or whatever). If B has Ub its value is Ub^2. If they interoperate then the value of both approach (Ua+Ub)^2. E.g. 3^2 = 9 and 4^2 = 16, or (3+4)^2 = 49. As service A adds users, services A and B both enjoy an increase in the value of their networks.
Edit: math notation.
Them: Here's a better lock!
I never knew such a thing existed, but after reading the page then "of course something like that has to exist."
* 1 History and geography
o 1.1 Columbaria in Ancient Rome
o 1.2 Dovecotes of France
+ 1.2.1 Colombiers (or pigeonniers) in mediaeval France
o 1.3 Dovecotes of Italy
o 1.4 Dovecotes of the Netherlands and Belgium
o 1.5 Dovecotes of Transylvania
o 1.6 Dovecotes of the United Kingdom
o 1.7 Dovecotes of North America
* 2 Architecture
* 3 Gallery
* 4 See also
* 5 References
* 6 Further reading and external linksCan we have some new cliches? These things are so last year.
You have a picture of your kid. You have your kid's name, on the picture or in your profile. Other information in your facebook finally gives a clue about where your kid goes to school.
It's relatively easy to snatch any random kid, although they might kick and scream and call attention to the kidnapper during the act.
It's a little easier to trick a kid into "helping me find my lost puppy."
It's easier still to talk a kid into a car with "Hey Bobby, I'm a friend of your dad. Yeah, your dad Joe Smith. He asked me to come pick you up 'cause he's going to be late."
Just one example, hopefully that doesn't work with most kids but it might with some. The point isn't this specific scenario, it's that when information is combined it becomes completely new information usable in ways you may not have foreseen. Kid snatchers are thinking about it way more than we are. Identity snatchers are thinking about it way more than we are.
I took down all my kid's pictures (actually all my pictures) last week.