newsicanuse

+1

What a buffoonery of a comparision.

I am not surprised thay this is an AI startup

C in author's name stands for chu**

Makes me wonder the kind of startup this peron is working for where slop is encouraged

I use rebase so much but it only feels comfortable because I follow a workflow while rebasing.

To ensure that your forecaat don't fall outside the range of training dataset you can use some tree based model like Random Forest for time series forecasting which averages out the values.

This guy is just another one of those ai-pilled noob coders

Sorry to burst your bubble, but AI is not going to play any significant role in a child kearning journey. Such a garbage application for those who need concrete knowlede and not some sloppy answers. Uselss application, I would keep a track about when this application fails.

Nicely written and lovely quote at the end.

Atleast not at Amazon

Writers like the author should go through the trauma of being a victim of juvenile crimes, only then will they stop writing such rubbish.

Sorry to burst your bubble but the cost of creating software has not, bloatware definitely has.

Great analogy all the way through. Also the last 10% takes thre most effort/iteration to get the work done such that you don't spend a lot of time maintaining it later.

He is become one of the techbros

The code that gets stuff done instead of beating around the bush making unxpected errors

Don't be one of those cluless techbros

pre IPO truck load of crap

Keep dreaming

Corruption, red-tapism and colonial-mindset had and still has more part to play than thr reasons you have stated.

An economist exytrpolating tech trends is already a hard sell. And deterministic unreliability is atleast deterministic meaning you can choose to ignore, this is still better than probabilistic AI hubris

I am really surprised that people are comparing dot com with AI. Atleast dot-com era was deterministic, comparatively AI is just a probabalistic unreliable slop

Comments like these make me feel like AI is a computer in the hands of a monkey, and that too the computer which is unreliable.

Hilliariously correct!

Cheaper to make plus unreliable and difficult to maintain. That is lose-lose for everyone involved.

When AI tries to improve such large code base who even is going to review the changes?

Source trust me bro.

At this point one might as well code by themselves

He has been one of those farce applied scientists at Amazon, so you can't expect any better.

Typical of Quanta magazine