75 karma · joined March 29, 2020
Use a PW manager.
But just use a PW manager (e.g. enpass.io ) I am very happy with it but I don't use the autofill plug-ins. You can never be paranoid enough.
Use a PW manager. If you really don't want to use one, don't use the same PW. At least at your own salt.
eg. HN@thepwialwaysuse4
HN would be the "salt" for Hackernews.
It should solve your problems. It is not open source and costs money if you want to use it on your phone (which I don't). Saves everything. PW, CC, notes, certificates etc.
You are wrong here. The 3rd option is to take money from the investors. The example given in this thread, Lufthansa, the stock holders should have been wiped out. It is called risk.
Too many programs that I was not able to install due to dependency problems. This is rarely a problem under Ubuntu. But I admit that it has been ages that I moved away from SuSE.
I will likely leave Ubuntu if snap becomes too common or the rule.
By the way, SuSE does an IPO soon but the IPO price looks steep.
So how you define "trauma"?
But this system would cost you know 1-2k. But I was lucky and bought the speakers for 100 USD not long ago.
The only one who was significantly able to tell if something was mp3 encoded or not, was a guy with a hearing damage who loved punk music. In fact, mp3 was developed for persons with normal hearing. So it is well possible that he was able to tell differences where other people were unable to.
But the back space connected/open with the main cabin.
I guess the next best thing would be a Land Rover Defender.
This car looks intriguing but comes with a huge price tag https://ineosgrenadier.com/
Do you know what I want? A mixture between a station wagon and a Pick up Truck. I love Pick up trucks but I don't find them well suited for transporting dogs.
If you look for an odd program try this: https://www.papyrusauthor.com/
Made for professional writes. Last time I tried it, I must say, it was fast as f.. (Installed with WIne under Linux)
Buddy of mine had two, one was illegal. When they make a law that you can have two, he made a third. I guess he will make a 4th now to send a clear message to the government :-)
Sure. But it is not forbidden.
Besides the odd circumstances, what outs me off is that he tries to link himself with former (well known) universities. He may have attended them, but he is in no way affiliated with them anymore. Crackhead-alarm
Yes, sure. Since they outsourced the energy intensive productions. But since you don't want to understand it, it is meaningless to try to explain it to you.
" It just has no bearing on a more realistic timeline at stake here." 10-30 years in not long. I claim we are seeing the limits of growth, and the central banking voodoo is a sign of it. And again, if economic growth stops, our economy and society will collapse too. A steady state economy can only work on the industrial level of the Amish people.
Then Germany is just extremely lucky, economically declining or outsourcing energy intensive production tasks.
You iPhone was grown on a tree in Germany?
"dumb extrapolation like folding paper."
This guy is a physics professor. I have meet many stupid people with a STEM degree in my life but stupid people seem somehow extraordinary rare among physicists. His central, important conclusion from the publication is:
"continued growth in energy use becomes physically impossible within conceivable timeframes."
"Germany already produces enough renewable energy to sustain all residential use." Maybe, a short look at the numbers look inconclusive. Besides that Germany relies on its neighbors to stabilize the net (speak nuclear!), it is unclear for me what the numbers mean. "Residential" use. Including heating? Basically everybody heats with oil or gas in Germany. You would also to take into account production costs (energy) of solar and wind energy harvesting systems. Please also see: "The institute’s Energy Charts project does not include data on the amount of power the generating facilities consume themselves to operate, or the power German industry produces and consumes without it being fed into the public grid."
The is an incredibly stupid publication from an MIT professor, claiming that energy efficiency is increasing (we produce more with less), based on statistical data. I think he did not understand the numbers. The US, like Germany is just exporting energy hungry productions to China. Consequently the numbers show exactly this. I emailed him the data an ask for an explanation based on his thesis but he did not reply.
"There is no real physical limitation to achieving 100% renewables despite your “argument”.
Either you did not read, or did not understand the link I posted. For the sake of the argument, lets assume that Germany CAN produce 100% of the required energy by renewable energy. What you don't take into account (besides exporting energy hungry productions): German does not only have to produce 100% of the energy, she has also to compensate for the GROWTH of energy consumption. Please read the article again. And this is something that is likely physically impossible.
"These are both very shallow articles."
You are free to have your own opinion. I consider both authors extremely smart. Gail Tverberg is possibly one of the smartest people I know. Ugo Bardi (not quoted here) is also worth to read. https://www.amazon.com/Seneca-Effect-Collapse-Frontiers-Coll...
PS: I think it was this guy:
The planet has a fever, and the cure is more capitalism, a prominent researcher argues
https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/06/20/134845/the-plane...
I emailed him that I think energy hungry production is just outsourced to China and that the seemingly more efficient production is misleading. I asked him based on the following two articles, if he still believes in his thesis:
https://ourfiniteworld.com/2011/11/15/is-it-really-possible-...
http://www.declineoftheempire.com/2012/01/wealth-and-energy-...
But he did not reply.
1. Yes, population growth may stop
2. Your argument with population numbers is totally irrelevant. Economics growth, which is linked to energy consumption, won't stop. If is stops, our society will likely collapse.
https://ourfiniteworld.com/2011/02/21/there-is-no-steady-sta...
In fact, with injecting trillions of dollars in the economy and negative interest rates, we may already have reached the end game. Exactly at the time from predicted by the Club of Rome, I think they predicted trouble for around 2030.
ROTFL
Edit: Yes, please feel free to show your ignorance and lack of basic math skills and downvote this comment. For all others: https://dothemath.ucsd.edu/2011/07/galactic-scale-energy/
I am sure Russia is not scared. Who should be scared is the world and who is scared is me but such dumb comments.
I see many start-ups advertising and betting on a blockchain technology by something that could be easier solved with a regular, central database. Are they just bullshitting?
Digital vaccination passports it an example. Why do you need the blockchain? A central government signature/database solves this problem.