netizen-936824

The biggest spyware vendor? What role is Microsoft playing here?

Did I miss something? What organism are you referring to?

An enzyme is a protein not an organism

Celebrities and influencers are literally just paid shills. That's how they make a large portion of their income, through advertising. Of course they aren't personally invested

Sometimes, the how is the why

Some religious people seem to like making things about religion just to be able to talk about it from my experience. Although this is also true for other subjects as well if the person is invested in the topic enough

Were those discussions about proteins in general misfolding or specifically serum albumin? This is an important distinction, many conversations I've overheard from those not in a bio field seem to gloss over vital details

You seem to be assuming that human selection is not natural

Humans are natural, we are part of nature

Do ethics matter or mean anything if we just start changing them to fit the situation?

I am not a physician. You don't need to worry about protein intake damaging kidneys unless you have preexisting kidney problems.

HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS OF IMMIGRANTS TAKING OUR JOBS

I don't understand how you can say

>values, etc are distilled into an “OS”.

When its literally not an Operating System. Its an application, no? It runs in user space on top of a real Operating System

>illegal or otherwise just destructive to the world

Emphasis mine, that word "or" is pretty important. In this context, it means that twitter will remove things they are not compelled to by law as long as they (twitter) feels that the statement is sufficiently "destructive" (whatever that means)

What does you mean by "the brain is mosaic"?

Signed, Conservatives

The problem could be solved by simply discussing definitions at the start of a debate, there's no need to come up with new vocabulary.

That's a great quote from Fred Brooks, thank you for sharing! Do you happen to know where its from?

I've learned that maintenance is way more important for most of my use cases. Most people aren't doing stuff that requires real-time processing so my assumption is that maintenance is more important for most others as well

So that sounds like there are characteristics of the etiology of viral-hep as opposed to non-viral which don't appear in this case of hepncaused by a virus? I'm not very familiar with the subject

This is actually where a shitload of disagreement and misunderstanding comes from. Due to peoples different perspectives, people have varying definitions of various terms. This makes discussing heated topics like politics super difficult because the people with different perspectives fundamentally generally don't understand the definitions used by the other and assumptions are made leading to disagreement

I read the wikipedia article on SPLC briefly and asked a clarifying question

Thank you for clarifying, it sounds like the organisation has changed recently

I looked up SPLC on wikipedia, read what they do, and asked a clarifying question.

For this, my original comment now is at -3

Yea that's why you make abortion and contraceptives illegal. Problem solved, no need for those brown people to boost our numbers!

NO gasp

Apologies, I misunderstood your original comment

I think someone is going to have to come up with some actual scholarly citations, because you and the top commenter to which I am referring are explicitly disagreeing and up until this point all anyone has done is make baseless assertions

Really? Because the top comment to which you replied stated:

>This is a problem as old as thought itself. One of the worlds first philosophers, Plato, wrote a book about it. He agreed, the best form of government is one where the terms are longer.

Unsubstantiated claims about the supernatural. Cool.

Oh, because the US has long terms implemented currently?

I agree with the required effort needed, but doesn't it only take one person to fork it? Once that fork is out there and maintained, the obvious choice for most people would be to use the free fork

Even if Monsanto is trying to influence reporting, that doesn't mean that the criticism against GMO is automatically correct. That doesn't even make sense

The previous commenters are talking about the criticism of GMO in which GMO organisms are suddenly killing babies because there's corn making fish proteins. The criticisms literally don't make sense from a biochemical mechanism standpoint, and the previous commenters are pointing this out.

That means that the previous commenters are standing up for scientific integrity while you come along saying "big company bad, therefore everything big company says is lie"