28 karma · joined January 24, 2011
(The counterargument of "don't use the service if you don't even agree with how the TOS is deployed" is technically agreeable but utterly impractical since "I am whimsical" clause in TOSs these days protects the vendor and not the user, and places 100% burden of trust on the user that the whimsical TOS will not arbitrarily screw you over later. Every vendor relies on the fact that there are so many other vendors out there, that some percent can eventually get a free ride on trust)
Suppose we provide the venue for congregation. How to ensure legal survivability?
What is an example of this?
http://mos.futurenet.com/techradar/Review%20images/TechRadar...
on both sides too!
Also has additional information on it.
The second language is crucial because it provides basis for comparison. If all you've ever used is Internet Explorer, that's the entirety of your internet experience. But if you've tried just another browser, you learn to appreciate the difference.
You are not there yet. Here's why. In pre-fluency stages of language acquisition, the taxing part of language parsing is memory retrieval, iow, mapping meaning from language A to language B. If you are well-versed at this, it can happen sufficiently quickly. For example, "a machine with four wheels that brings people places" --> car. After enough practice, you "bypass" the "machine" and retrieve "car" without consciously looking up the word. Imagining that happening for every single word, and every single sentence construction. That's when you're "there".
As for coding, there is an easy example: iterative looping vs. map/reduce operations. These can express the logic but are conceptually different: one is to repeatedly track states across some number of times, the other is to apply a transformation function to a set of items. To reuse the car analogy, a looped factory would be like taking parts and assemble 100 cars, and a map factory would be like taking parts and assembling all the wheels, then all the engines, then all the doors and so on.
update: searched a bit, cannot find any supporting evidence for bioh42_2's statement.
At least we know there's a nonzero probability that your perceived insufferable stupidity is monotonically decreasing. :-)
Why, no, I am not interested in healthy living.
The git part somewhat laborious, but until SparkleShare gets released officially that's what I'll work with.
I should add that I arrived at Mendeley after Bibdesk, after Zotero.