475 karma · joined April 15, 2010
But one goes deep into how to set it up with deep integration on Docker Machine and DigitalOcean on a more expert level.
While the other provides a very simple beginner level Play with Docker setup and then goes on how to install an entire application stack, with frontends, databases and workers.
Stopped following their feed, once I came to the same conclusion as the OP: being overly funded is (almost) the only way to go get featured on TC, these days. The times of roaming the edges of startup-land and posting about the nitty gritty startup struggles are long forgotten.
I prefer the former as it enables me to have the dev/test env as similar as possible to the prod environment: same naming, and both env's are separated, when one gets compromised at least the other one doesn't suffer. Security rules are also easier as you don't have to create per-table rules, when you want to lock out some team-members from production tables, but not dev/test tables.
I can imagine they are ok with that if your app provides value to their ecosystem.
We are looking for people: * loving to put 100's or 1000's of datapoints into nice and shiny dashboards
* have expertise with PHP/Node/MongoDB/Redis
* familiar with versioning svn/git/mercurial
* eager to question everyone and everything if he or she thinks something can be done better/different and enhance the experience
Feel free to contact me at nils@woorank.com with your github profile/portfolio/blog
On the other end, it might get you a little extra cred to prove your rising traction.
Better to go for more specialized blogs, they are better for overall conversion.
For us this is also a very stressful situation, because if the worst case scenario becomes a reality...
"Some customers will be required to reach out to (some or all) of their customers to have them re-enter billing information."
... we can spend days contacting clients to get the payment credit card (which in some cases they should go to their boss for), and go through the billing process again, only to hope to get the list as near to a 100% recovered as possible.
Time for Billing Provider Redundancy?
http://aws.typepad.com/aws/2012/01/aws-howto-using-amazon-el...
For instance, if you write to MySQL and Mongo, but your Mongo is down, you'll either have to queue the data item somewhere for a write once the system is back up, or you have a migration system in place that gets everything from MySQL since the downtime and writes it back to Mongo.
Depending on the type of data we have a few easing factors: for some data stores it is not that big of a deal if it doesn't get written to it's 2nd layer (eg. cache) as we can rewrite it the next time it is requested in layer 1.
- memcache: for caching of data that doesn't persist - redis: caching of data that needs a to be persisted short term but not on the longer term (eg. sessions) - MySQL: for user-like data (account details, addresses, projects, ...) - DynamoDB: for millions of data points that only needs to be queried in 1 dimension, so are not related or compared to one another. eg. give me all values from this table containing a given datatype, between 2 dates - MongoDB: for millions of datapoints that need to be queried on deeper levels - etc.
I hope they introduced some NoSQL sweetness by now.
So spoiler alert suggestion revoked...
Even the simplest replication needs 3 servers, add sharding to the dance for extra performance and the server counter jumps up. For startups this is a major decision to consider as a full-time ops guy isn't always affordable. Luckily, PaaS services as MongoLabs and MongoHQ save the day.
Who did they offload the work to then?
I don't say agile development is a bad thing. But some managers tend to be led by cool buzz words and obey the manifesto way to strictly.
Agile development is different for every team and situation, not a one-stop-shop everyone should adhere to.
Asana had constant issues with syncing the data.
We've put up the Trello board on a big screen in the office and after some tweaking (eg. cutting the tasks in smaller bits) it's amazing how productivity rose, just because people are pushing the enveloppe for getting a ticket from the left to the right.
Also for a workflow of a ticket having several states (planned, in progress, done, reviewed, pushed, live), and going back and forth a lot, we just didn't find a nice way to do this in asana, without having lots of projects with several sub-lists, having to reconsider the workflow again and again, etc.
Asana looks more promising to me, when used in bigger companies (20+), having several departements, using there own projects or workspaces, with their own flows and way of working.