nba456_

The consequences of environmentalists killing nuclear.

Yeah everyone is so scared they became the biggest company in the world today (again)

We need to hurry and kill this tech before environmentalists try to make other fertilizers illegal and cause mass famine.

no it doesn't

Micron had to delay their New York memory fab by a year because there were some bats in trees. This stuff is DOA in most states.

How could you have worked at Apple during the entire Samsung lawsuit and say Apple has no history of suing competitors over IP theft?

Not really, just slowing down a potential competitor could still be worth it.

Like when Apple sued Samsung. Why bother with the free market when you can just sue your competitors?

Steve Jobs would've drowned OpenAI in a thousand lawsuits like he did Samsung. He knew better than to compete fairly.

Reminds me of Apple suing Samsung. Why bother with the free market when you can just sue your competitors?

Yes?

> Aren't monopolies is what we end up by default if have no regulation at all?

No.

What you're describing is a global government, otherwise that can't be enforced.

And who does the tax get paid to? Some mythical Global Government that will totally work this time?

Oh great the NIMBYs are coming for space now.

>Besides, IP law is dead. The rise of AI made it pretty clear that you can steal literally anything without consequences.

God, AI keeps making life better than I could've ever imagined!

Too bad he wasn't colorblind.

Then why does Texas install more solar?

If Europe was as willing to drill for gas as the US is, they'd probably be able to run more ACs and save thousands of lives every year.

You can't trust consumers with what they say they want in their marketing.

The NIMBYs are coming for space launch sites, too.

GenZ might be outspoken and booing commencement speakers, but the usage numbers don't lie.

Of course it is. Young people are always more eager to adapt new tech while older people yell at clouds. AI usage is MUCH higher among young people.

I don't agree at all for these coding models. Even the most anti-AI people from last year seem to be giving in to using them.

If his entire personal diary got exposed and that's the worst that's in it, good for him.

No, there isn't. At this point you would have to wipe out humanity to get rid of AI.

And then hope nothing else ever evolves intelligence.

They don't want hope, they want to doom

> No, the US is _leading_ the AI race, but the race isn't over.

When someone says their football team is winning in the first half, do you say, "Umm, no, they're leading, not winning!"

Even if it leads to global disaster, you'd rather be the country with the best AI. You won't be saved just because your AI is worse.

Wow, never seen a post with so many comments posted overnight like this.