2,058 karma · joined December 29, 2010
Meta ToS - https://www.meta.com/legal/supplemental-terms-of-service-upd... Meta Privacy Policy - https://www.meta.com/legal/privacy-policy-updated/
PayPal - https://www.paypal.com/us/legalhub/upcoming-policies-full
The common denominator in the communication copy seems to be related to accounts belonging to minors. Microsoft mentions "If you are a parent or guardian, you are responsible for your child’s or teenager’s use of Microsoft products and services, including purchases", Meta's highlights revolve around "Parent-managed accounts", and PayPal did not provide anything meaningful about changes in the email.
It was a bit of a slog and I’ve never been tempted to pick it back up, but it was worth it.
I believe the program he was using was djPROAI[0].
This smells like an accounting trick to boost published revenue numbers, and seems plausible given that Stubhub announced they were on IPO track last year.
Further, the shell companies could be something Stubhub is doing to derisk the arbitrage portion of the transaction to isolate losses associated with inability to sell the tickets for a profit to the shell company rather than to Stubhub.
Further, the shell companies could be something Stubhub is doing to derisk the arbitrage portion of the transaction to isolate losses associated with inability to sell the tickets for a profit to the shell company rather than to Stubhub.
Stubhub was supposed to IPO in 2022, but it doesn't look like they did. This kind of 'gaming the numbers to pump valuation' doesn't seem implausible for a company that is trying to IPO.
If it were only related to contact of food with teeth, wouldn't rinsing your mouth after eating achieve the same effect as any diet like "carnivore diet"?
It seems like those notices were made in bad faith. It would be nice if they faced some punishment.