734 karma · joined March 29, 2022
https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/the-duke-who-loved-tun...
===
"Support Void", "Voiding", "Customer Voiding"
Tossing all customer support requests (and sometimes customers themselves!) into the void.
Pros: Sounds snappy and dramatic. Has humorous resonance with voiding your bowels.
Cons: Meaning not immediately clear. Sounds active when the problem is really more passive.
===
"Customer Neglect", "Customer Disservice", "Customer Ghosting"
Opposite of "customer service."
Pros: Meaning is more obvious because of its relation to Customer Service.
Cons: Not quite as snappy.
Well, looks like I was only partially right. Most access is still "free", but at the cost of enshittification.
I admit that the current sanitized, standardized net is probably better overall. It's certainly more accessible. But I do appreciate sites that make weird personal choices like this.
Then we adapted. People learned about Wikipedia's strengths and weaknesses. People use Wikipedia as a useful tool for research but don't trust it blindly. I think the same will happen with LLMs.
Also, the guests can be pretty hit-or-miss. Some are great, some are pretty terrible.
We can hope that even if the Reddit protests ultimately go nowhere, they will at least have shifted public opinion, if only slightly.
Not much of a walkout. That just sounds like lunch break.
Even in the suburbs and countryside, people illegally dump trash all the time because they don't want to pay to dispose of it properly. Anywhere you go, you will see signs imploring, "don't throw away your trash here!" under which are mounds of trash.
It may be true that Japan is on average a bit cleaner than other countries, but not nearly so much as people seem to think.
Good to read a story where teen hackers get rehabilitated rather than heavily punished and pushed further into crime. That said, they don't really strike me as genius hackers. More just opportunistic and perpetually online.
For example, I'd like to try out algorithms that:
+ Prioritize people who post less often
+ Prioritize people with less followers
+ Prioritize posts with less engagement
+ Let me manually choose people to prioritize/deprioritize
I'm not sure any of these algorithms would actually be any good, but the point is I want the freedom to experiment. I suppose this might be theoretically possible with ActivityPub/Mastodon, but I haven't seen any implementations.
The earliest instance I found of Erwin Knoll's quote is from 1982[0]. I suspect either Michael Crichton or Gell-Mann had heard this quote, which in turn influenced their discussion.
[0] https://www.nytimes.com/1982/02/27/us/required-reading-smith...
+ The 3D animation is cool.
+ The concept is intriguing.
The Bad
- The AI-generated story can be interesting but tends to be pretty repetitive, often getting stuck in a feedback loop that doesn't make any substantial progress. This is a common problem I've noticed with AI-generated stories.
The Ugly
- While interesting at first, the word puzzles quickly become a boring chore. They aren't particularly difficult, just busy work like solving a captcha. This is ultimately what made me stop playing, I probably would have played much longer if I didn't have to constantly solve the puzzles. More variety in types of puzzles, or at least making them appear less often would probably help.
I like the concept, but I think it deserves a better execution. Although ultimately I think interactive fiction is better when written by humans.
As the article says, I think these days it's pretty safe to just use Python's built-in venv and stay away from everything else.
We already have real-world examples of this, such as algorithms erroneously detecting welfare fraud.[0][1]
The "pause" idea is both unrealistic and unhelpful. It would be better to educate people on the limitations of AI tools and not let governments put them in charge of important decisions.
Smaller apartments are even more ephemeral. The official service life for apartments according to the tax code[1] is only 20-40 years, depending on the construction material.
[0] https://hamatawa.com/lifespan/
[1] https://www.keisan.nta.go.jp/h30yokuaru/aoiroshinkoku/hitsuy...
Also, I think this is good advice even without the proliferation of deepfakes or GPT spam. I already abandoned social media in favor of small group chats and Real Life long ago, and I know I'm not alone. The only habit I still need to kick is reading too much HN. ;)
On the other hand, I do think that humanity always finds a way to adapt, even if it's not the most ideal way. I'm not as optimistic as you, but not as pessimistic as the doomsayers.
Somewhat fittingly, I was unable to find a reliable source for Knoll's law aside from a 1982 NY Times article[0]. Perhaps even the law itself is a fabrication.
[0] https://www.nytimes.com/1982/02/27/us/required-reading-smith...
Also, if the goal is to ensure the LLM "thinks" in a "safe" way under the hood, the current methods seem insufficient, as jailbreak prompts show it's not really changing the underlying model. Feels more like slapping a band-aid over the problem.
Not sure controversial is the right word, in fact I think it is quite a common sentiment among developers, especially those that originally come from back-end. The only problem is finding a company that is willing to forgo the frameworks.
They do exist though. Here's a short list of companies that use vanilla JavaScript, most notably GitHub and Netflix: