James Niehues Ski Map Artist
jamesniehues.com
jamesniehues.com
You can see his style in a short video [0] and two German newspaper articles [1] [2] with some pictures.
He describes that his job is not to depict reality one-to-one, but to create an appealing image with the details that are important to the clients.
"‘My most difficult assignment was the panorama of the Arlberg region,‘ he recalls of a particularly elaborate case. Because the tourism associations of St. Anton and Lech permanently disagreed on the size of the depictions, Vielkind had to completely rework the image a total of five times."
0 - https://www.brembeck.de/full/heinz-vielkind-35462
1 - https://www.derstandard.at/story/2000047191820/lifte-pisten-...
2 - https://www.spiegel.de/fotostrecke/panoramamaler-heinz-vielk...
1. Clearly cares. Does great work.
2. Industry is like "damn this guy does great work, do ours".
3. Consumers get used to the style. Begins to become a standard.
4. Becomes an expectation, almost like a seal of approval. "This is a ski resort".
I think it's the same reason why marketing websites for many SaaS products all look very similar. A product like Stripe with a very nice marketing site becomes successful, many other companies follow suit and copy the style. The style becomes ubiquitous. "This is a SaaS product website".
The same could be said about a lot of consumer products...cars, laptops, phones, food packaging, even art and music. There's so much stylistic homogeneity. Obviously part of it is fashion, but what is fashion except consumer expectation?
Ie you can tell sth is a school just because of how it looks
We were just talking this morning about how this guy has made a career for himself.
I actually like the "monoculture" because it makes it easy to understand how resorts are laid out. It is consistent.
One of the things they talked about was System 6 or System 7, and an example of how it was different from Windows 3 in one of many ways: The system bar—“File”, “View”, etc.—was at the top of the screen, not each window. This consistency made it easy “throw” the cursor to the top of the screen and get to the thing you needed, a consistent experience, no matter what app you were in or what the window layout was.
This “consistency of experience” point always stayed with me as such a core principle of good design, whether in computer UIs, quick serve restaurants, or here, I guess, ski map visual style.
I'm from a small mountain town in Norway. There's about 2500 people here normally, but >40000 people here now during Easter. I like your "happen to be", heh, feels like everyone's here!
Our poor little roundabout. All traffic in the city has to go through it. The roads aren't built for this amount of cars.
I'm so curious. What do the resorts pay him for this service? Is this a full-time occupation for him? Who owns the IP rights? Did he have to negotiate them back to be able to create his book?
I used to also love piste maps as a kid, and still go skiing a few times per year. One of the best activities I know. Outdoor, exercise and spectacular views for a whole day. What a dream!
Then (inevitably?) ... "I wonder what the right AI model and prompt could generate in Niehues' style..." Maybe a solid facsimile. Maybe "superior" in some way. Less than happy thoughts. Regardless of output. Don't want.
I think I need this book.
If I scroll down to continue reading, some thing slides in from the bottom right to sign up for newsletter. That basically makes me just close the tab and not care anymore.
I assume whoever runs this website gets more income out of having this thing slide in than not have it exist.
But at least myself close the website because of it. Is my brain wired so differently from other people? Does the thing that slides in make most people interact more with the website, instead of less like me?
At least if most people dislike it, like me, I can't imagine they'd gain more income from making this slide-in thing. Or is there only a tiny percentage of people that like it, and just that tiny percentage gives so much income to the website that the other 99% all have to suffer?
I like 'em all.
I bought my friend the ski map book as a gift, highly recommend it.
Back before him resort maps had a lot more variety.
The artistic map is nice to look at if you’ve been to the mountain before but loses so much detail on proportional distance and heights between each route that I end up using google maps or OSM overlays my first time on the mountain.
3D maps offer more detail but are a pain to navigate and are often disorienting for non-technical users.
My thought is a "2.5 degree" hybrid map. One that maintains the important 3D detail but keeps the navigation "on rails" so as to make everything easier.
I'd be curious to know your thoughts on this, keeping in mind that this would be targeted at casual users and probably not HN types (HN types probably have no problem navigating/groking a true 3D map).
If you’re trying to get a sense of terrain, the “FATMAP by Strava” 3d map is the best I’ve seen, with notes on off piste routes and various aspect, incline, topo etc overlays (and this is not a paid promo).