[0] http://blogs.cornell.edu/info2040/2019/10/23/uber-ride-shari...
465 karma · joined May 29, 2012
[0] http://blogs.cornell.edu/info2040/2019/10/23/uber-ride-shari...
The the access provider for both the copper and fibre network (right to the customer premises) is a regulated wholesale only provider, which is required to provide open access to its network on a non-discriminatory basis between all access seekers (retail telecommunications companies).[0]
This almost entirely resolves the net neutrality debate in New Zealand.
[0] This is a slight simplification: Chorus is the network owner for the copper network, and about 70% of the fibre network. The other 30% of fibre network is also built, owned and operated by wholesale only providers on a comparable basis.
This struck me as particularly interesting. Corn, arugula, tomatoes and lettuce are all a product of selective breeding. To what extent has this been applied to "sea vegetables" and what might the possibilities look like?
However, the design does mean significant pressure stress on the front and rear of the cylinder. This must be managed with extensive (heavy) structures.
A doughnut design, in theory at least, solves for this by removing "the ends" of the cylinder.
On that note, how would this affect the all important question of how to most efficiently board an aircraft?
Airbus said although the design was worthwhile enough to protect with a patent — like about 6,000 other ideas its engineers devise every year — it was not an immediate prospect for shuttling passengers from Heathrow to JFK. “This is not something that’s currently under active development,” Airbus said.
[1] http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/ba80c518-6492-11e4-b219-00144...
Of course, once your investment had grown past a certain
point, it would be impossible to put into any stock
without drastically affecting the stock’s price. In many
cases, investing this volume of cash would be
impossible [...] we also did not take into account
trading fees nor changes in the composition of the S&P
index. We also assumed that all companies allowed for
investment in fractional shares.
Moreover, even if one made the impossibly optimistic
assumption that picking the best stock of the day is a
50-50 guess, there would be only a one-in-3.53
trevigintillion (3.53 x 1072) chance of matching these
results.
There's another humorous follow up on Quartz, positing that "[i]nvesting a day late every day would have returned 19.6% in 2013".[0][0] http://qz.com/158489/investing-a-day-late-every-day-would-ha...
Edit: spelling.
The [basis minimum income] scheme proposed by the Welfare
Working Group is a significant policy change with large
economic consequences. The scheme is fiscally very costly
and would not necessarily achieve its main goal of
reducing poverty. The high personal tax rates required to
fund the scheme are highly distortionary to the labour
market and to savings and investment decisions, and would
be likely to induce a significant behavioural response.
This has damaging effects on the tax system and economic
growth.
Also of importance, from the same report: Although the Gini coefficient improves under all models,
many beneficiaries (including the disabled, carers and
sole parents) currently receive more than $300 per week
and would be made financially worse off under a GMI
scheme.
At a high level, it seems that the economic reality of providing a basic minimum income to everyone requires a significant increase in taxation revenue. That might be possible with significantly higher GDP per capita, but I'm not certain we're there yet.[0] http://igps.victoria.ac.nz/WelfareWorkingGroup/Downloads/Wor...
Edit: formatting.
While this process is currently conducted by paid-for editorial teams, most practitioners rely on citation tools which for any judgment provide links through to subsequent decisions which have, for example, "approved", "considered", "distinguished" (as in disapplied due to different facts, but this can have the practical effect of confining an earlier decision to its particular facts) or "overturned" that decision.
Although Google Scholar seems to provide some authority measure through the "cited by" tool, I've often wondered why academia (or perhaps I've just missed it) hasn't developed a comparable "precedent" system for research.
Also, while I'm not familiar with the listing rules in the US, it strikes me as difficult for a company like Monsanto to acquire a company like Blackwater without disclosing it to the market (but IANA(US Securities)L).
In my experience, the question is not "do you have an authorised / specified alarm service" (although there is usually a distinction between monitored and unmonitored alarms), but simply "do you have an alarm system?".
[1] http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504803_162-20026088-10391709.htm...
It's conclusions were broadly:
* To be cost neutral, it would require a significant increase in taxation rates (to a flat tax of ~45% - 50%).
* Although the Gini coefficient is improved, those who currently receive government support would likely receive less under a GMI scheme, which may have the effect of distributing more money away from those most in need.
A brief discussion of the "broad ranging" effects on efficiency and economic growth is also included.
[1] http://igps.victoria.ac.nz/WelfareWorkingGroup/Downloads/Wor...
I'm guessing people have a bunch of third party apps installed that don't respect the mute button?
No, it doesn't. If anything, I think the use of the Oxford comma would make this more clear (although the most elegant solution is surely just to draft the sentence in a less ambiguous manner).