mucle6

I'll take the bait. I work on ads at Meta.

What am I on trial for that I need to use the nuremberg defense?

> I won't be surprised if the next gen frontier models are the last.

the last?!? I'm excited to see :) I'll take the other side of that since llms are so new

This feels like the start of a paradigm shift.

I need to reunderwrite what my vision of the future looks like.

Haha this feels like you're playing chess with the hackers

re 3: I doubt Google is going to hand over the weights to Apple to put on device.

Statistics are not a license to assume.

Crime rates also statistically correlate with demographics, but if I assume a specific person is a criminal based on that stat, I would (rightly) be called racist.

Expecting people to assume 'historically black' == 'poor' similarly feels racist.

My interpretation is it would be less likely to happen near a wealthy neighborhood compared to a poor neighborhood. Why talk about race if its not about race?

You’re conflating race with poverty.

It feels racist to expect people to assume a neighborhood is 'resource poor' just because it is 'historically black'.

Also, the OP explicitly states that lawsuits are pending. Clearly, the community was able to mount a legal defense

That makes sense. For some reason though I still sense a hint of desire for retribution in the original comment

The phrasing 'historically black neighborhoods' feels like it pushes a specific agenda rather than just addressing the pollution.

It implies that if this were happening near a non black neighborhood, it wouldn’t be as egregious, which is a strange moral stance.

Also 'historically' is irrelevant. Pollution hurts the people living there now.

This reminds me of the quote "I know just enough to be dangerous"

I wonder how long until we have an AI on our shoulder saying "Hey why are you booking a new flight, there is a better option"

That is infuriating corp speak. I'm sympathetic if a business can't fulfill its obligations, nobody wants to fail. If they had admitted they messed up and wanted to fix it then I honestly would be okay with that.

But to try to ditch their responsibility with a technicality is so scummy. I don't have T-Mobile, and with that one line of corp speak I never will

Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZe5J8SVCYQ

I think they already had a company for each letter when they became alphabet

The text to modify a video looks so cool

Source?

Indentured servitude prevents switching jobs, so we can't assume its their best option. As long as workers are free to switch jobs, we can assume its their best option, that despite all of the downsides, they think its worth it.

I'm guessing Amazon pays above average and that's why people keep working for them despite their reputation. The people there have a choice. Keep making more at Amazon but be treated poorly, and that's a choice they make.

If Amazon doesn't like a worker, they can fire them.

If a worker doesn't like Amazon, they can quit.

You can hate Amazon, thats fine, you can choose to never work for Amazon, thats fine, but lets not lie to ourselves. The people who choose to work at Amazon want to work there. They all applied, accepted the job, and show up every day.

If the workers want better conditions they can leave. If all options are below what we would consider moral then we should change laws. The solution to a problem in a free market is not inside of one company.

Everyone else in this thread frustrates me, but I understand it. Compassion is ingrained in us, while free market economics is not.

Nobody here is really thinking through what happens if they are successful at boycotting and destroying Amazon. What would they say to these people they're supposedly helping?

"I got you laid off! You don't have to work here anymore! You're free! Maybe you can't feed your family now but at least you can move your lips while you drive!"

If they're working there, they believe its their best option.

If you're successful at causing amazon to crumble and they lose their job, would you really feel good?

Imagine telling them they don't have job anymore because you know better than them whats good for them

If apple wanted to or thought they could make a profitable search engine, wouldn't they have already done it?

So a progressive tax system like what we have? (ignoring capital gains taxes)

I agree, in my opinion, a common misconception I've seen is people saying wealth isn't zero sum. It can be created from thin air, but as long as there are needed and scarse resources (housing, maybe medical, maybe ivy league college), the market will adapt to consume more of the wealth.

So wealth can be created but it makes everyone else slightly poorer in different ways

It looks like the vision costs the same for GPT-4o vs mini.

Both start with 150x150px and if you click the (i) it says mini uses way more base tokens and way more tile tokens, it still costs the same...

I was going to correct you but I was wrong

For anyone else that got tripped up... 1x to 3x is 200% growth because you don't get to count the original 1x

My best guess is they're lying, or they model curbs to have a "low damage score" so its okay if the ai thinks theres a 10% chance a path will hit a curb.

I'm excited for self driving cars, but I have reservations about a system that has to hard code "don't hit a telephone pole". It reminds me of this skit https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3m5qxZm_JqM

These white swans prove there are no black swans! \s

Does it feed your audio directly to gpt4?To test it I said in a very angry tone "WHAT EMOTION DOSE IT SOUND LIKE I FEEL RIGHT NOW?" and it said it didn't know because we are communicating over text

I just used the voice on my phone after switching to gpt4o and clicking the headphones in the bottom right on iphone

How am I just hearing about this?! Aider looks cool