779 karma · joined February 15, 2009
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/mtarnovan; my proof: https://keybase.io/mtarnovan/sigs/JqYEmv9M9kNh_lzs7e-THXpY1hFl4b6ONxwf51QuPgg ]
This seems to be implying that this level of tracking is expected, or required. It's not. Not by Google anyway, which doesn't need and should never access this information.
Still, it should be noted that Fowler warns that CRQS adds significant complexity and advises great caution about using it. See https://martinfowler.com/bliki/CQRS.html
Wow, the very definition of 1st world problems right there :D
After all, perfect information is a condition of perfect competition (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_competition)
So you're basically saying that if I'm using Starbucks' WiFi it's surely their prerogative to read my emails or whatnot ("inspect" my traffic)
The limit applies only to persistent connections.