393 karma · joined February 6, 2012
Users tend to be quite happy about it, and we're profitable enough to pay comfortable salaries and have...a lot...of runway.
Of course, this model is possible because there was never any outside investment.
In the real-world, they're often used for precision gauging for in-process metrology.
So many don't buy an LVDT, I guess.
The situation for visible diode lasers is much worse. Sure, the power tends to be lower, but they're still powerful enough that looking at a diffuse reflection will result in dangerous power densities on your retina. Unfortunately, the brain is really good at hiding this sort of damage, so it's possible to not notice until it's too late.
1.064um fiber lasers are the worst of both worlds. Very high powers, invisible so you have no idea how much stray light is getting out or if you're staring at a reflection, and expensive + hard to verify safety glasses.
I like doing things with high power lasers (next up for the collection is probably a 355nm ns system?), but am glad that I had to take a lot of laser safety training before I bough my first big laser source.
The other interesting thing is that duality kicks in (or maybe becomes non-trivial, since it's always there) and derivatives naturally start to live in a different space. If you take the particularly natural definitions of general cos_p and sin_p I alluded to, you get a nice parameterization of the unit p-circle as (cos_p(t), sin_p(t)) - but if you differentiate this wrt t, the resulting tangent vectors don't lie on the p-circle. Instead, they form a parameterization for the q-circle!
However, this (circumference/arc-length based) definition of pi does have a fascinating property for conjugate p,q: pi(p) = pi(q)
"Squigonometry: The Study of Imperfect Circles" is a very fun reference for this sort of stuff.