1,913 karma · joined March 29, 2016
Michael Artin's Algebra is a good, concrete book with tons of motivation and zero prerequisites. Wanna try it? ;)
This might help.
Um.
It's sad, I agree, but I wonder how that can be an argument in favour of holding back mathematically curious children who are clearly "hungry for more"? Does this end up improving diversity down the line?
Edit: The author seems like a very, very disturbing individual. Does anyone on HN have a bit of a back story on this person?
Also, "Mr Kgnao" is a cute spin on my username :)
I originally intended it as a reference to Ulysses, where James Joyce captures a cat's sound as being similar to "mrkgnao".
There is a lot to be said for the need for differing opinions on, say, social mores, finance, healthcare, government, and philosophies of life in general. That is to say, I agree that the intellectual/philosophical right-wing is indeed not at all similar to the caricatures we see.
I have a hunch, though, that highly religious and closeted people (of the "Do not be educated lest you lose your humility" kind) are almost tautologically biased against evidential "scientific method" models of the world, as opposed to one where all truth flows from $HOLY_BOOK. And if you'll look closely, it is this part that is ridiculed, largely for the unquestioning nature of its beliefs and worldviews.
Aside: I have a feeling I'm stepping on the wrong side of the Slate Star Codex "outgroup" essay with this. If there are any logical fallacies in this, or anything similar, I would appreciate comments. I'm not a seasoned observer of politics or society :)
(I looked at the pics and saw `List.map` everywhere.)
Um, what? I mean, apart from some fancy/hypothetical cache aligning nonsense, I have no idea how this makes sense. Maybe someone can explain?
All this talk of maxima and minima reminds me of Morse theory, for instance (and that Wikipedia page is more than what I know about it). [1]
Is there any sense in what I'm saying?
So not all the "groupiness" is captured by actions.
Also, Bill Thurston's beautiful "On Proof and Progress in Mathematics" [1] contains several ways to understand the derivative, in addition to it being a look into what a very distinguished mathematician thought of the nature of the mathematical pursuit. Pretty similar ideas, explored in depth.
Edit: Apparently this is linked to in TFA :)
You can't just say that and leave us hanging!
And the bit about cutting the search space to a third (which is what I believe you meant, instead of cutting it /by/ a third) is something you can also do when searching a list, but IIRC halving is preferred because it has better worst-case time-complexity. You can always split a list into 1/3 + 2/3 instead of 1/2 + 1/2, but you risk having to search the 2/3 every time, etc.
That's one thing we don't have to worry about any time soon.