709 karma · joined September 9, 2009
twitter @himrc
facebook himrc
github mrchess
self himrc.comFrom the screenshot it looks like the UI is very nice, but the picture isn't big enough for me to take it all in and reinforce what my gut is leaning toward.
For me, I just want to see bigger pictures of the actual interface and that would be enough to pick a direction.
It looks very interesting, but I'm not quite sold yet, though I am interested to learn more.
One thing to understand about music is that the letters are meaningless, as learning by letters restricts you to playing in a certain fashion. For some reason letters got introduced, I don't know why, but all that matters is the distance between notes.
Not learning letters first allowed me to easily transpose into any key since the LETTER DIDN'T MATTER.
Cool idea, but has some serious limitations in real music, the obvious one being transposition.
The customer in this case was put in a position that made him feel that he needed to publically shame. A good PR/Customer Support rep would have seen this coming and would have defused the situation earlier.
(terribly hard to view in the blog post IFRAME)
I wish it was advertised more what large projects using Angular and that they are actually architected completely with Angular.
Or would it be a hybrid of Backbone + Angular?
Would love to hear the opinion of someone more experienced.
What does this mean? To me it means that the way a company structures itself needs to change. More ownership needs to be given to employees, and founders need to get less.
That how I want to start my next company. Double the options pool, and lower the founder equity. Just because your employee #1 and it was my idea doesn't mean I get to dilute your share of the company but that big of a margin. We'll all be doing a ton of work.
That being said, can someone tell me why this might be a bad idea? :)
EDIT: On a feedback note, 5% or less is very vague on the pricing page... Why not explain a bit further the upper and lower limits?
Fast forward to today -- looking back it was one of the greatest investments in my life so far as all the stuff I learned both emotionally, psychologically and professionally has really helped with current work and life.
I used to think losing money was a big deal, but now I realize it isn't. Investors are in a sense "buying" your time. Can you really put a value on your time? Your own life?
Sure, the memories were disappointing and frustrating, but I wouldn't have had it any other way. And yes, I plan to save and try it again.
EDIT: Just to be clear I'm not saying throw VC money around... of course you still need to be responsible.
There are many entrepreneurs who have raised again from VCs even after they didn't make it from their first raise. As long as you tried your hardest, there isn't much else more you can do. Keep at it.
Converting $1 = 10H might seem like a simple conversion, but you'd be surprised how difficult it can actually be for many general consumers. I've seen people bring out calculators to split a $130 bill evenly between 13 people.
"so you go to this website and trade your stuff in for honey."
"wait you mean money?"
"no honey. but honey is like money, you can use honey to buy stuff just like money..."
etc.
EDIT: I just looked the pricing model and it is evokes weird feelings. Any reason why you don't just do a 1:1 ratio? Why force users to compute a secondary calculation. True, it is a multiple of 10 but still a calculation and makes me feel like I'm making a foreign purchase.
I spent a long time looking for good info only to find outdated or poorly maintained docs, and a very little sense of "community".
I'll probably grab this book to get me jumpstarted. I'm happy, yet sad that I have to find my information this way -- says something about the community IMO (not a bash on you, but just a nag on the Django community as a whole as I feel it doesn't really like helping beginners).
1. Apple rejected the cable. To those who say "just go USB", it was
supposed to be a seamless product and that destroys aesthetics.
Image is everything in product design.
2. In parallel they were working on Christie Street, to solve the
issue of non-refunds on Kickstarter.
3. So why not turn something bad into something good? Get some press
for their new site, and also issue refunds for everyone. How else
would they issue refunds? And how does anyone lose in this situation?
If anything, this seems like a great and fair way to deal with the issues at hand.Sidenote -- the draft -> publish mechanism is very unintuitive.
After 3? weeks of no response, I clicked escalate button to firm up the dispute and push it to Paypal so they could decide. I thought I had a clear cut case -- photos, documentation, 21 days of seller not even trying to defend himself.
Seller, upon getting the final warning, finally replied with a message along the lines of "I offered a refund but buyer never contacted me" with no proof... and Paypal voted in his favor.
Fuck Paypal.