1,466 karma · joined September 25, 2017
Yet, it's weird to me that we're 3 years into this "revolution" and I can't get a decent slideshow from an LLM without having to practically build a framework for doing so.
I mean if you are talking about USA itself falling into dystopic metastability in such a situation, maybe, but even so I think it misses some nuance. I don't see every other country following USA into oblivion, and also I don't see the USA bending the knee to techno-kings and in the process giving up real influence for some bet on total influence.
The only mechanism I see for reaching complete stability (or at least metastability) in that situation is idiocracy / idiotic authoritarianism, i.e. Trump/his minions actually grabbing power for decades and/or complete corruption of USA institutions.
This is suggesting an "end of history" situation. After Fukuyama, we know there is no such thing.
I'm not sure if there is a single strong thesis (as this one tries to be) on how this will end economically and geopolitically. This is hard to predict, much less to bet on.
OpenAI => nVidia => OpenAI. That's pretty circular.
That's just an appeal to masses / bandwagon fallacy.
> Is it so hard to believe that ChatGPT is actually productive?
We need data, not beliefs and current data is conflicting. ffs.
PS: Half-joking, you can write some big portions with LLMs but the point stands.
Anyways, this is old and the original post didn't get much attention anyways: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44985844
Non-cynic take: exploration-based endeavors still may end up in useful developments.
So let's bet on sunken cost fallacy? That didn't work out during the dotcom era.
When people talk about the bubble is mostly about ending the LLM hype, not making everything associated just disappear. The infrastructure, ideas and developments will stay and probably end up being a lot more useful without the noisy hype surrounding it right now.
You are crazy if you imply AWS Athena or Azure Synapse are better than BigQuery.
Not sure what you refer about "talk therapy" in this case (psychoanalysis, maybe?), as even CBT needs homework and check-ins to be done.
Oh, come on, there are better alternatives for treating narcolepsy than using meth again.
I was following the string of questions, but I think there is a logical leap between those two questions.
Another question: is Language the only way to define models? An imagined sound or an imagined picture of an apple in my minds-eye are models to me, but they don't use language.
Let's hope there is no basilisk.