mpapec

> That claim is utterly false.

Can you repeat that using some of sock accounts?

It would appear more convincing if coming from puppets too. :)

> The claim that I'm operating other accounts here isn't just unfounded, it's malicious defamation

Actually you have been caught at least once in sockpuppeting, so it's not a defamation rather a possible and realistic scenario which shouldn't be dismissed.

https://archive.ph/472MO

Looping is not required to qualify as a Turing machine, and it never was. Bitcoin intentionally doesn't have loops, and higher level language sCrypt offer just that.

Please show working implementation of SPV for starters.

And, greetings again.

=============== @DrCraigWright ===============

Really... What well known address. Not one is PKI'd. There are addresses I have asserted are, ones that others have stated. There is nothing that proves it beyond reasonable doubt. Or, do people just assume as I created it that I must be the only miner? That may be, but it is not more than circumstantial evidence and is a long way from proof.

Signing with a pseudonymous key is no proof. We all know that you want to use the _Dread Pirate Roberts_ defense - I was only just handed these keys... But that will never be. It does not matter at all what you say. You shall learn just how far gone you are this year and just how many people see you as the fool.

Enjoy failure... It has been your life and it shall remain so.

Thank you for explaining how censorship works; I hope you're not one of these cypherpunks who whine when censored. ;)