That said, some of the people posting slop projects as their own probably idolize him and would embrace the comparison!
656 karma · joined January 31, 2020
That said, some of the people posting slop projects as their own probably idolize him and would embrace the comparison!
POD was pretty rad :) Thanks for the reminder of it (and all the MMX marketing around it.)
Namedropping another contemporary reference, I probably downloaded them from the Hornet Archive or a mirror.
They were a major step along the short but satisfying road to my first 3D starfield using Borland C++ (acquired via a magazine coverdisc). I felt so l33t.
Indeed. Thinking is not the same as experiencing thinking.
> there’s no way to know if any other people, much less machines, are conscious.
Or even ourselves :D
"Consciousness is just an illusion" "If so, who's experiencing the illusion?" "Yes"
I'm curious what were you referring to here. Did Packard Bell make Apple 2 clones? I didn't find anything in a quick search.
But if FL Studio (formerly FruityLoops) and Renoise use the same layout, as others have said, then those are probably going to resonate with a wider modern audience :D Or maybe just call it "FL Studio / Renoise / tracker layout"?
I don't do computer keyboard note entry any more, but I still have the muscle memory for that 4-row layout from hours spent with it in the late 90s :D And I'd totally use it in your game. (My MIDI keyboards are kinda too far away from the mouse and monitor.)
On a US keyboard:
QWERTYUIOP[] is the white keys starting at middle C. (The row above is the black keys; the 2 key plays C#.)
ZXCVBNM,./ is the white keys starting an octave lower. (S plays a low C#.)
The two ranges overlap; e.g. Q and , both play C in the same octave.
Grew up composing music on a computer this way when my (musical) keyboard didn't have MIDI and I couldn't afford a better one :)
That is, his “pure engineers” are not really doing engineering, at least under my understanding of the term, whereas (some of) the impure engineers actually are! :)
Oh, but they did, and quite infamously :D
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_BMG_copy_protection_rootk...
https://arstechnica.com/uncategorized/2005/11/5549-2/
https://www.networkworld.com/article/715376/network-security...
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240779158_Lessons_f...
I think it’s more likely aimed at the (internal) promotion committee.
> Generating more complex solutions that are possibly not understood by the engineer submitting the changes.
I'd possibly remove "possibly" :-)
Reviewing human code and writing thoughtful, justified, constructive feedback to help the author grow is one thing - too much of this activity gets draining, for sure, but at least I get the satisfaction of teaching/mentoring through it.
Reviewing AI-generated code, though, I'm increasingly unsure there's any real point to writing constructive feedback, and I can feel I'll burn out if I keep pushing myself to do it. AI also allows less experienced engineers to churn out code faster, so I have more and more code to review.
But right now I'm still "responsible" for "code quality" and "mentoring", even if we are going to have to figure out what those things even mean when everyone is a 10x vibecoder...
Hoping the stock market calms down and I can just decide I'm done with my tech career if/when this change becomes too painful for dinosaurs like me :)
> "ST" officially stands for "Sixteen/Thirty-two", referring to the Motorola 68000's 16-bit external bus and 32-bit internals.