137 karma · joined December 19, 2017
(I do transit with my macbook in my backpack, which is a likely cause of the rub marks)
Counterpoint; LiveOverflow (also a channel on YouTube featuring reverse-engineering) had this to say on the manner, in very broad strokes, YouTube monetization, and hosting, is a luxury and they as a private org can choose what or what not to host.
There are also plans to bring the Apple TV app to Smart TV platforms as well, so a similar framework may be on the way for TV too.
That being said, I have high hopes considering their latest efforts, the new terminal looks cool, powershell is useful and WSL2 looks to bridge the gap. I'm a die hard macOS user that requires Windows for a variety of work tasks, i'm glad to see the effort and competition.
Currently, if an app isn't signed and you have Gatekeeper set to "Allow apps downloaded from App Store and Identified Developers", you'll get a prompt stating it isn't permitted to run. If you open it using the context menu, you'll get a button in that prompt to "Run Anyway". Alternatively, recently blocked apps by Gatekeeper appear in System Preferences allowing for manual override as well.
I'd imaging the notary service would be included in the "App Store and Identified Developers" section, and the same restrictions apply.
As for your own software, XCode signs it with your Apple ID automatically. Everything else, via terminal is the same as always.
I can understand trying to resolve dependencies can be a royal pain, espescially trying to find the distro's specific naming conventions, like libpq-dev vs postgresql-libs
Wish it was easier to mix the two, it's pretty nice being able directly interface through dotnet, be even better if I could have fs and cs files next to each other.
I suppose expensive retail spaces? Apple has got mail-in and phone service but I've never really heard anything about it.
Of course, any sane person would have a discussion with the customer about whether or not they wanted to try a simple fix versus replace the whole damn thing, which is the crux of the overpricing argument.
The other argument is cost, Apple faces massive short supply on the Genius Bar, so having more bodies that can do simpler repairs faster (ie blind part swaps) seems to have won out over having technical talent properly diagnose and repair the machine.
They could have alleviated this through their authorized service providers, but hobble them with massive fees, high part prices and overall little trust (often being last in line to receive technical documents and training for new devices). Just check out Linus Sebastian's iMac Pro saga for an insight.
Overall, it's a massive system orchestrated to give Apple maximum control over the entire process, and nowhere near enough supply for consumers. It's now actively hampering their experience, leaving people without the super glossy Genius Bar experience or a cheap option at all. I believe they've just put too few resources into this area and are too greedy to loosen the stranglehold of control for third parties to pick up the slack. Directly in contrast to their whole "we want these products to last" argument from the recent iPhone release keynote.