1,320 karma · joined December 1, 2015
However, there are many use cases where they aren’t the right tool for the job.
And you seem confused about how an LLM works and what it is - “the intelligence of all humanity” - not how it works. You’re debating using 2 imaginary things you created.
It’s common advice to wire in deterministic feedback to your workflow with LLMs - static languages aren’t inherently better for LLMs, it’s that LLMs produce better code when given deterministic feedback, such as compiler results.
The GI issues are caused by the creatine absorbing water. This causes your gut to have more water than usual as it follows the creatine through the works… which causes… urgency.
The effect diminishes after you’ve been taking a regular dose for a while, even with just monogydrate (not HCL).
Some people say HCL causes less distress because it doesn’t draw water as much. Others argue that defeats the purpose of taking it.
Monohydrate is studied to death and proven effective, HCL not so much.
Saying “you didn’t like it right” is gatekeeping.
The closest thing would be telling someone they’re reading a choose-your-own-adventure book wrong somehow, and even then it’s a stretch.
Would it be so wrong for someone to enjoy something in a different way than you do? Or should they be chastised for enjoying it the wrong way?
You’re welcome to ask what brings them enjoyment, to broaden your views, instead of dismissing them.
and there are bold mushroom hunters
but there are no old bold mushroom hunters.
Is the bummer that we got a solution we didn’t want - that navier-stokes is not always applicable or something, but we hoped it was?
TIL Bowser is an actual word, huh.
Have you used both? I’ve never experienced any seemingly greater level of intelligence from Fable 5 over Opus.
A bit more direct