monkpit

Or, open the comments and then click the title link. Then click back when you’re done reading the article, so you can read the comments. That’s my preferred mobile workflow anyways.

You replied to a comment saying the companies don’t care to make it easy. Then, you shifted the blame to parents instead of the companies. I got your point just fine.

Spoken like someone who has never used parental controls. They’re a shitshow.

* definition of bad is subjective and may vary depending upon which lobby group has the most cash to throw around

Really tragic, honestly, the way Coleman’s life ended without him being properly recognized and compensated for what is possibly one of the most sampled pieces of audio ever.

You don’t think the two are related in the least bit?

I’m sure they’ll just come up with some other branding, they’ll “go bankrupt” and reorganize, and call it good in the public eye, and everyone will have forgotten about it in a year or two.

Which, funnily enough, is _also_ something you can teach your children.

Yes because everyone else on HN is one hivemind, other than you of course.

A slurry is a type of suspension, I guess.

Does jellyfin offer intro/outro skipping like plex pass does? And hardware accelerated transcoding?

The only thing keeping me on plex is my lifetime plex pass, and family inertia.

And what percentage of the software in the world needs to come close to human-quality code? I’d argue the percentage of the whole is VERY low.

It doesn’t take any longer to have the llm script this kind of thing, one off or not.

Until someone comes along and changes it without updating the name, or the value comes from a remote service and they change without you changing your name… etc.

Plus the fact that there’s bias in the first place - citizens in a country where they know social programs will care for their needy would not need to donate.

> gotcha

Gacha?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gacha_game

You said “let them know after you already bought it” - again, why would they care?

What makes you think they would care? If they cared they wouldn’t have done it in the first place.

(n=1)

Words are a representation of an underlying something; LLMs do not deal with words, they deal with tokens and embeddings. There’s a transformation layer between words and inference and back.

> I highly doubt it.

Not a very convincing discussion point without some support.

Reminds me of psDooM

https://psdoom.sourceforge.net/

For what definition of “tolerate”?

wild to call out a random org like that…

How is it fraud? Who is being defrauded? What is the impact to the victim?

You can’t make a contract that breaks the law, it doesn’t work that way. It’s unenforceable and doesn’t hold up in court.

Otherwise, you could just make contracts anytime you wanted to break the law for any reason.

It doesn’t mean _inside_ the apartment. It means if they decide to film a commercial and you’re walking your dog in the background, they don’t have to ask you.

> Unikraft needed an engineer to add capacity by hand

This seems a little unfair - the _architecture_, as designed, required the human in the loop. The tool doesn’t require it.

Important to whom?

Who controls the prompt? Shareholders? And how do you have confidence that the prompt is being used? Just thinking out loud, it’s an interesting idea (even if it might be terrible and dystopian).