https://www.patagonia.com/stories/culture/design/on-tumpline...
202 karma · joined September 23, 2012
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/thoma; my proof: https://keybase.io/thoma/sigs/nIlV6UddrFQcH2J5sfe0DVEKBFYWZKFnSTnD1ZbbiUI ]
https://www.patagonia.com/stories/culture/design/on-tumpline...
What really took it to the next level for me were adding chord mappings. For example I can hold right mouse button + scroll the thumb wheel to adjust volume. So convenient!
In the early days I feel it was more apparent. You would frequently see the model making failed tool calls etc.. but now that feels so rare. I'm not confident I can perceive whatever shortcomings of the harness remain.
Agents need clean/current context from the web, and this is the best way I’ve found to give it to them. The internet is clearly moving in this direction: companies are starting to realize their sites need to be legible to agents. Some are already adapting but many haven’t yet. Context feels like an important part of that transition
Yahia is a great builder. His pace of expansion has been impressive, excited to see where he takes Context.
One of the core ideas is that later climbers should respect or improve upon the style of the first ascensionist. e.g. if a climb was first done using siege tactics, then doing it in a single day is celebrated. But making a climb easier or safer after the fact is much more controversial, because it can feel like changing the nature of the route itself.
Snake Dike is a good example that’s flared up recently in the climbing world. It’s a classic, relatively easy route up Half Dome, and many climbers free solo it. But because it’s a face climb, protection mostly comes from bolts drilled into the rock. The first ascensionist placed very few bolts, which left long runouts and real consequences if you fall.
To many old school climbers, adding bolts to Snake Dike is disrespectful because the risk is part of the route’s character. Their view is basically: don’t bring the mountain down to your level. The new generation of climbers don’t seem to feel that way at all - they think you shouldn’t have to take unnecessary risk to climb a classic route.
https://gripped.com/news/first-ascentionist-pushes-back-on-h...
The biggest pain point I've had is that both tools will try to guess the API of a crate instead of referencing the documentation. I've tried adding an MCP for this but have had mixed results.
One small feedback- the motion design is waaay too much. You should consider dialing it back 2-3x.
Regardless, need to see more benchmarks to better understand its true performance. If it holds up it would be a big win for time forecasting.
LingQ's killer feature for me is that as you click on words (or phrases - which I find really helpful btw) to translate them, they are added to your vocabulary list. It will automatically create flashcards for you from this list for SRS. Plus when you're reading a new story, words that are in your vocab list are highlighted yellow and new words are highlighted blue.
Some companies have made headway in eyewear and shoes (https://www.amazon.com/b?node=23595320011). Clothing is much more difficult - a lot of variety in body shape to accommodate.
That's not to say the remaining 55% are broken on 3.11, just tread with caution. For comparison, 71% explicitly support 3.10.
I don't see that reflected in this map at all fwiw. https://sf.atmo.ai/temperature@37.83200,-122.51075,13.53,20,...
Are you all planning to implement as extensive of a collection of integrations as Zapier has?
at unspun.io our customers create a body scan and we use that to make completely custom garments.
have you all considered supporting a use case similar to ours: virtual try-on with a 3d model as the input instead of user uploaded image?
The hard part will be accurately extracting the anthropometric features from the front/side/back images that Halo captures. There's a chance they would initially launch an iPhone only app and leverage the face scanning depth sensor.
We've really liked it so far. It cuts out a lot of the bad parts of synchronous standup like trying to remember what you did yesterday on the spot, but still leaves us with the opportunity to share ideas in depth when it makes sense.
I think completely going to an async standup right now wouldn't be good at all for our team dynamic. With the whole team remote, standup is the one time a day we're all on a call together. There's a lot of value that comes out of that even if it's inefficient at times.
Not quite on the level of the Romans, but still a solid improvement over how I've done it my whole life!
It seems to me like the session persistence tmux gives would be worthwhile if you have a lot of simultaneous sessions going.