3,966 karma · joined July 15, 2021
They're displaying screenshots on E. coli, which is very cool!
The joke has been around forever. Big bang probably did the best “popular” showing off it.
Everybody needs tmux, especially locally.
My terminal splits panes (which I don't use), but what if I want to open two terminals that share the same set of splits? Can't. But tmux can!
What if I want to SSH back into my desktop (because I'm on a laptop or whatever) and grab something from my desktop terminal? Can't. But tmux can!
Vim splits and the vim terminal are poorly implemented. Technically, yes, they work. But you'll run into a lot of issues. I know, because a few years ago I went down the same path: Why do I need tmux, when I have vim!? ... I quickly learned why I needed tmux.
I agree with your side note: plasma+kitty+tmux and a few support scripts:
(please don't criticize my scripts; these were never meant to be shared, and it's a disaster, but it works for me)
I have this script (https://doc.xn0.org/tmuxedkitty-newwindow.sh) bound to WIN+T; it opens kitty, and either creates a new tmux session if there isn't one or attaches to the existing session and creates a new pane.
Then, I have my insane (I understand I am insane, but it works for me!) tmux config file: https://doc.xn0.org/.tmux.conf
Then, I have my insane zshrc that auto-titles my tmux windows: https://doc.xn0.org/.zshrc
Using titles from: https://doc.xn0.org/tmux-window-titles
I have put way too much thought and time into this...
Personally, I much prefer the CLI. The CLI is a tool that has been refined for over 50 years to excel at text input and output. Once you learn it, it can feel like an extension of your brain.
Because "I" don't know what "I" am.
Am I a brain? Am I a soul? Am I the universe?
I have no idea. Science currently has no idea. Religion is unprovable.
I want to donate my organs. If my death can bring life to others, it would be a truly amazing deed I could do.
On the other hand, if I am just a brain, I do not want to be locked into some sort of drugged, half-conscious state where I can't scream.
I wish HN showed the edit history >:(
Not the brain, the center of conscience, being kept in some sort of horror-movie half-alive state. I do not think we understand consciousness enough to rule out what those brains are experiencing.
Step-by-step instructions: https://rclone.org/iclouddrive/
I just tested, and it worked... rclone is such an amazing and incredible project.
Apple has a great PR (propaganda) department that has convinced many people they respect your privacy. In truth, they do not. They're "better" than Google, but only slightly. And only so slightly that realistically it doesn't matter.
"Apple is taking the unprecedented step of removing its highest level data security tool from customers in the UK, after the government demanded access to user data."
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgj54eq4vejo
It happened in the UK; it will not be long before it happens in the US.
--
Also, USA: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-36084244
--
Also, France, Germany, Australia, Brazil, Japan: https://www.apple.com/legal/transparency/pdf/requests-2024-H...
--
Also, Russia: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-02-04/apple-fil...
--
Also, China: https://www.article19.org/resources/apple-cares-about-digita...
--
Also in general: https://proton.me/blog/iphone-privacy
> Most water use in data centers should be able to be self-sufficient, mostly closed
[Citation Needed]My understanding is that data centers CAN use closed-loop systems. But, most don't if they're not forced to, because it costs more than evaporating towers.
According to this[1], 88% of water-cooled data-centers use open-loop evaporation towers.
"up to 85% of the water data centers use evaporates and does not return to the water supply" [2]
[1] https://intelligence.uptimeinstitute.com/sites/default/files...
[2] https://mostpolicyinitiative.org/science-note/data-center-wa...
Examples of games that use HJKL are the text-based "graphic" adventures like NetHack, the Rogue series, and Linley's Dungeon Crawl. It is also used by some players of the Dance Dance Revolution clone StepMania, where HJKL corresponds directly to the order of the arrows. Gmail, Google Labs' keyboard shortcuts, and other websites use J and K for "next" and "previous".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_keys#HJKL_keysEDIT (the above is a bit more snark than I intended, let me add a little more):
NFS's direct (still widely used) competitor, SMB, natively supports:
- Authentication
- Transfer encryption
- Authentication encryption
- Has open implementations across platforms
- Supports individual account management, and large enterprisey account management (LDAP/AD/etc)
With SMB, I can share out a directory on the network that allows visitors access, optionally authenticated with a simple username and password.I can share out specific directories with easy control over who can access what. You know, basic network file sharing capabilities.
[[ And, don't take this as a love for SMB, it too has many issues and legacy junk ]]
I am criticizing NFS as a whole, and specifically its Linux implementation.
Now, how about this common scenario: I want to run a file-sharing server on my network. I want a random "friend" to come over and grab a copy of a file, but I don't want them to see any other files on the NFS server.
So, the "friend" has root access on their device. They can just log in and lie to the NFS server, claim they're my UID, and see all my files that I didn't want them to access. Configuring KRB in that scenario is totally impractical.
However, in the /etc/exports file, you can (but shouldn't) add the share option "no_root_squash" which disables that.
So, root access is slightly protected. But all other users are wide open.
The fact that NFSv4 has no concept of true "Authentication" and just blindly accepts whatever the client sends is the craziest network application design ever:
Client: Hi, NFS server, I'm Bob! UID=1000
Server: Hi Bob! Here's access to all of Bob's files! I trust you and don't need a password or anything!
Client: Thanks!!!
Some of you may nitpick and say, "well ackkkuallyy, NFS supports authentication through GSSAPI/krb."And to you, I say, that's crazy! Setting up Kerberos just to authenticate users for access to my Linux ISOs is a crazy large requirement! Sure, it might make sense for an enterprise that already uses Kerberos + LDAP + NFS + certificate management, but for everyone else, that's a lot of infrastructure to set up and maintain for what should be BASIC functionality.
EDIT
ALSO!!! Why the fork does NFS run as a kernel module (nfsd)!? Shouldn't that be an external daemon!? Who the heck thought any of this was a good idea!?
<sarcasm mode>
Dev1: Here's a great idea! Let's run an insecure network server in Kernel space!
Dev2: OMG! You're so smart! Let's also exclude any encryption!!!
</>
//end rant of an old, bitter Linux sysadminIt's a purposely poorly-turned engine + accelerator control.
TL;DR: poor turning, and floor it (high RPM).
This video gives a pretty good overview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=miTnnJ7xMv8
Just the first thing that came up in a youtube search, there are thousands more:
"Safety Inspections" were generally just a grift for third-party repairshops to collect free money and I couldn't be happier that they are no longer a thing.
Be aware that "safety" and "emissions" are different. Emissions testing is still required biannually for newish vehicles and yearly for older ones.
[1] https://www.deseret.com/2017/3/9/20607904/lawmakers-remove-r...
Anyway, if you really want to know what your browser is sending:
If you're looking to buy a CT and have the money for one, considering the price difference after taxes and other fees.
The RWD-only CT didn't make much sense when you could get AWD for a few thousand more, which increases range, torque, and speed.