224 karma · joined February 10, 2014
EDIT: All but one of the 11 teams were tech/programming required startups guys. I'm not talking about "Startup Weekend" as a whole, I'm talking about my experience at the event I went to.
Seems like SF is on top of it, Milwaukee on the other hand, only cares about how many years of experience you have. Nothing else.
If people are asking/begging for the tool to be open sourced, then they do indeed value it. Otherwise, why would they care if it just withered and died?
They may not have valued it as much as the product was charging for, but that's a different debate entirely. I'm assuming there was some discussion of commercial viability, lowering prices, etc. before they chose to shut down. (You pretty much said this part in your second paragraph, this is the "execution" part.)
I have people that ask me to open-source my current side-project all the time (one that is paid), and I find it insanely disrespectful.
"Yes, let me just hand over the source code for my commercial product. How about not."
I'm not trying to sound greedy, but money speaks. If these companies want the software open sourced, they should be pitching in for the cost. If you don't think something is worth money, you don't value it at all.
EDIT: Perhaps this is a good place to drop the "challenge" I gave myself and invited other developers to join me a few months ago.
DEVELOPERS - I challenge you to spend some money TODAY:
https://mattkremer.com/developers-you-need-to-stop-being-so-...
Tech Used: AngularJS, Firebase, Firepad, EasyRTC
Statistics: Just broke 700 registered users and 5000 file collaborated on. Have made a little over $2000 from 125 people going Pro.
History: I started back in December, but gave up too soon. I've since relaunched it as a smaller product and am super happy with how it's been received. Here's some blog posts about my journey. Please let me know if you have any questions for me!
https://mattkremer.com/how-i-got-2200-pre-signups-for-my-saa...
https://mattkremer.com/how-i-made-2033-in-4-days-while-valid...
I actually wound up converting 4% of the 2200 to one-time paid accounts, and am experiencing a lot higher use with the new version. 20% of visits result in 2 or more people collaborating on a file.
Sadly I'm struggling to get actual monthly/yearly subscriptions, however I think this is more of a CTA problem than a problem with the product. I really need to focus on getting the landing page better, and having a better CTA within the app.
Thanks again!
https://mattkremer.com/how-i-made-2033-in-4-days-while-valid...
Let me know what you think!
I posted this article on my blog a while back about how I gave up too soon on my SaaS:
https://mattkremer.com/how-i-got-2200-pre-signups-for-my-saa...
Since failure, I've successfully relaunched the product and am getting a lot more actual traction than the first time around :)
I've implemented Facebook, Twitter, Google and GitHub auth as well as a custom domain login at Kobra.io
It was pretty easy to set up using Firebase SimpleLogin. Overall my goal was to get as many people to try the app as possible, and then if they like it have them sign up. I didn't want to lose people that may not actually sign up but would if they tried the product, so I also allow anonymous usage of the app.
Let me know if you have any specific questions for me :)
That is -definitely- the point I was trying to get across. Instead of looking like a spammer, if someone posts your articles of their own volition, it is an immediate validation that the article has the possibility of making it to the front page.
I'm not saying you can't submit yourself, just taking the more "scientific" approach that if someone else submits, you success will most likely have a higher probability.
My coding beginning was actually when I started a business picking up dog poop (no joke) when I was 9 years old to buy an N64. I convinced my dad that I needed a website if I was going to be a "real" business, and he taught me my first HTML.