misssocrates

Are there any counter examples of remote-first new companies that built something exceptional while always being remote?

Isn't taking the blame part of why CEOs get paid millions of dollars? 226 of them in this case. Pichai signed up for it and is objectively a winner too.

What are the odds there are missing details in this story?

Doesn't he say that most regulation is good and is currently pushing for regulation of AI?

Are people confusing lithium with cobalt? Where 70% of it comes from the Congo.

Why hasn't he been pardoned by either party?

That would help. When are they going to resume?

What, you don't like the subscription model they added in 2024?

Dear sir, are you suggesting that something that worked well for certain things at certain times may not automatically apply to all 21st century industries in the year 2023?

Is there a template these companies are working from?

> If you are among those impacted, you will receive a calendar invite to a 1:1 meeting with a manager in your department within the next 10 minutes.

Dropbox also today:

> If you've been impacted, you'll be sent a calendar invitation within the next 30 minutes for a 1:1 with a leader on your team https://blog.dropbox.com/topics/company/a-message-from-drew

How did you figure out this diagnosis?

While obesity hits an all time high, one wonders if we traded one vice for another? Is it better to smoke if it means you eat less? Or vice versa? What's the tradeoff in health?

Are there more health problems as a result of smoking or obesity, in cases where one has made this trade?

But something like 50% of studies don't replicate?

It's both easy to forget why Uber/Lyft was revolutionary and easy to remember why.

They should be faster, but don't they support voice commands while driving? That's the idea so you don't have to touch it much or at all while driving.

It goes both ways, does it not? Companies and their respective goods or service can't survive without being profitable.

Was that proven? And how close did employees get to taking over the company?

Wouldn't it be useful for tracking down any human being?

Is anyone else getting tired of the "employees say", "experts say", "researchers say" tactic in journalism?

How many? And importantly, what percentage is that? What do the other employees or experts say?

That's funny, but what if you look at the past 20 or 30 years so you have a larger sample?

I may have missed that one or didn't think of the question yet.

It worked for Bezos!

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DEwmbZVVoAEfWJq.jpg

What percentage are entrepreneurs and what percentage are people with mental health problems and or drug addiction?

Why did they frame it the way they did? It's strange how they made it sound like a bad thing.

The news media gave him $2 billion in free media coverage during his first campaign alone. Does 4chan come anywhere close to that?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_coverage_of_the_2016_Uni...

How? What's their technique for overcoming the anxiety with a live stream audience?

There's an argument that the world of atoms stalled decades ago and most growth since then has been in the world of bytes.

If that's true, why? What happened in the world of atoms?

That's why I said there is no evidence.

Didn't the Fed say it was transitory inflation? What changed?

Were these jobs paying more to the previous employees than they are offering now?