732 karma · joined August 5, 2024
That's not great.
I think you miss that people tend to become less idealistic and further right as they get older. The "boomer" generation is just replaced by more of the same people. It's never going to change.
write(message), read() -> message
> Or programs talking to each other using HTTP.
request() -> response
> Or Erlang processes communicating concurrently on one machine or across a network.
sendMess(message), waitMess() -> message
> Or different programs sharing one database.
execute(query) -> response
...
I'm a mathematician at heart so I'm staying away from category theory as long as possible.
What you are doing is muddying the waters of the argument by making that association. Are you not the racist then by suggesting the attribution?
If you can't criticise extremism without being called a racist, we are truly and utterly fucked as as species.
I suspect it's somewhat inconsistent but they are a big problem for many states who are looking at political and economical stability.
Incidentally it does work. It's just horrible. Nagasaki / Hiroshima are a fine example of forced capitulation. Now I'm not suggesting nuking anyone but the best way this ends, with the lowest future body count is someone wins decisively at this point.
Well the number of killed versus injured is significant and not mentioned. The mention of children is bundled with the large figure. It could be interpreted that 3000 people were killed, 2900 of which are children, which is exactly how it will be quoted and portrayed.
This is pretty irresponsible use of language.
Check headlines and how this is portrayed and compare the statistical figures mentioned. Also who is being quoted and if they are in quotes or how they are quoted. There's a lot of ambiguity.
In times of war, which this unfortunately is, irresponsible reporting is dangerous and leads to further problems.
Edit: Above is retracted - cjbprime found later information.
> It killed and injured more than 3 thousand people, including children.
That can be rewritten with some academic honesty added if you try.
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israeli-police-cla...
It is quite well defined.
Also notably, it clearly did not intentionally target civilians, although there may be civilian casualties which is uncharacteristic of a terrorist attack.