The examples in the post are clearly x86-64 running in 64 bit mode. I.e. it's running in flat model... there is no segmentation to worry about.
4,318 karma · joined December 28, 2010
email: plesiosaurus99@gmail.com
The examples in the post are clearly x86-64 running in 64 bit mode. I.e. it's running in flat model... there is no segmentation to worry about.
They have him in emails literally saying things like "If I keep entering the same clip sizes, people will become aware of what I am doing rendering my spoofing pointless" and "I need to know whether you can do what I need, because at the moment I’m getting hit on my spoofs all the time and it’s costing me a lot of money."
It's not a huge reach for the government to claim he was spoofing when he himself claims he was spoofing.
How could a small trader like that possibly move enough volume to even budge the market as a whole, never mind crash it?
I think people who aren't familiar with trading (especially futures trading) don't understand that Sarao was spoofing massive size. He was placing orders for 500+ contracts at multiple levels in the book... that's on the order of $100M notional value. He was more of a pro than people like to believe.
I don't think this is correct. glibc has architecture specific hand rolled (or unrolled if you will lol) assembly for x64 memchr. See here: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob;f=sysdeps/x86...
Eligible collateral for initial margin includes cash, debt securities that are issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Department of Treasury or by another U.S. government agency, the Bank for International Settlements, the International Monetary Fund, the European Central Bank, multilateral development banks, certain U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises’ (‘‘GSEs’’) debt securities, certain foreign government debt securities, certain corporate debt securities, certain listed equities, shares in certain pooled investment vehicles, and gold.
From here: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-11-30/pdf/2015-28671.p...
My only point was that some people think all HFT is bad, and here we have a complaint that actually the situation is reversed and it was actually all human market making that was bad. I don't think either statement is completely true, and I was trying to highlight the contradiction because the human market makers and the HFTs are, in a lot of cases, the same people.
† https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2013-11-06/cftc-sues...
A derivative (e.g. a CDS) would be more like a side bet between two (possibly unrelated) parties based on the performance of those bonds.
I don't know about the other three cities, but you can concealed carry in Chicago and that has been the case for almost three years now.
The other reason this is unlikely to be a problem is that network time protocols break all the time (oops someone did a maintenance and broke sync with the master clock). Lots of real world trading code has sanity checks on the time.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB100014240529702047893045780871...
I didn't care for the article, but this comment is awful and you ought to feel bad about writing it. Did black people moving into an overtly racist white neighborhood in 1960s era Atlanta feel guilty about it? No, they were probably fucking terrified.
One day in June, a black family moved into a home on Woodbine Avenue, just over the southwestern Kirkwood border in Edgewood. That night someone set fire to it.
Did you read that part? Come on.
The tie in to IEX is tenuous at best.
A U.S. equities exchange has to be registered with and approved by the SEC. There are currently 12 of them. As a registered exchange you have to play by certain rules, and in exchange your displayed top of of book is subject to the order protection rule, meaning that no other venues (exchanges, dark pools, ECNs, or broker dealers) are allowed to trade through your top of book quote without first routing an order to you for the full amount of the displayed size. Exchanges also get a share of SIP revenue (which is important to exchange economics).
In it's most technical definition, a dark pool is an ATS (specifically not an exchange) that has no displayed quote i.e. no market data whatsoever. Most ATSs in the US fit this definition, though there are also ATSs that display a quote. For example, IEX is an ATS that has feed for their top of book quote... so technically not a "dark" pool.
NYSE doesn't run a dark pool and it would be weird if they did. Most US equity exchanges support fully hidden (completely non-displayed) orders, so if you want to trade in the "dark" on NYSE you can just send a hidden order. I think this is one area where futures exchanges and equity exchanges differ. In futures you have icebergs but not fully hidden.
2)
Wholesalers aren't allowed to give you a worse fill than the NBBO. That's the law. Often they will actually give you a tiny bit better than the NBBO on marketable orders. I think they do this so retail brokers can advertise price improvement. For most of the low cost retail platforms there is no ability to direct your order. You give it to the broker and I think basically if it's a marketable order they send it to the wholesaler and if not they post it to an exchange that offers a liquidity adding rebate (the brokerage keeps the rebate, natch). If you are willing to spend a little more on your brokerage account, you can use a platform like Interactive Brokers which does let you route orders directly.
“As a trader, if you do well, you will retire before you turn 30,” said one employee on an industry message board.
That is basically 100% unattributed, unconfirmed bullshit.