mikewang

The micro service is not micro anymore.

This is super cool. I have to say this. I love your concepts.would love to see it better.

BTW, do you open-sourced all of it or just parts. Because I see your github repo does not update for a month. can I run this local?

not sure how. But when I asked GPT with this line and the issue was found exactly.

The issue is tiny and slipery for a very big table. But I am still curious of why test can not find it.

>During the work day, this was fine. We probably committed 10-20 times a day (directly to main of course) which would cause new backend deployments to occur, giving us 40 new IDs for customers to potentially use.

They just use the test env for prod? When to push code, the CICD should be run and some examples should be run too here. And every time, the env should be clean. Here the database does not change from test to production.

As I learned that 85% of its trainig data is English. Othere languanges composed of 15%.

I made a quick test: 1. GPU resoursce consuming. 16G~ 2. I test some document other than English, it is poor.

I came accross a lot of such info from redhat. And I tried podman which is not bad because my scenario was not complicated. But days before, I tried podman-compose which behaved so poor. That's a pitty. After years, podman's ecosystem is so poor. I don't want to be trapped by sorts of small/hidden pitfalls. I have to switch back docker then. The quality prevails, not the advertisement. PS: I did not read the passage. The title is enough.

I read the blog twice and have some thoughts: The root cause seems is as: "While deploying a change to our prefix advertisement policies, a re-ordering of terms caused us to withdraw a critical subset of prefixes."

And a dry-run: "a Change Request ticket was created, which includes a dry-run of the change, as well as a stepped rollout procedure."

And a Peer review: "Before it was allowed to go out, it was also peer reviewed by multiple engineers. "

I would doubt the expertise of tech guys of cloudflare, reviewing the change. And there was a dry-run.

But is it really OK to apply the change to a spine network which would affect 50% network traffic? Just out of peer review and a dry run? No green/blue, no gray release, maybe these are not proper for a small change here. But this "small" change really got big affect. I thougt it was worth it.

And from my shallow experience, the dry-run would always have do nothing to the env. It is dry-run anyway.

And at last the three lines are found out. So I wonder how did this re-order happen? And why?

With these tiny changes, there should be some mechanism to verify their correctness, not just review and dry-run.

any more detailes about this?

Yes, I got one which affected me a lot.

It was a story about my last manager. 2 years ago, I transferred to Cloud team internally from blockchain. Yeah, both of them were so hot and even today. I had to make this transfer because I have to relocated to another city where my family resides. And my mom was so sick, I had to consider to take care of her. This is the background.

At the first few weeks, I tried to learn the new knowgede of cloud native and it was so depressed. I was so new and I was not an open man. Because my mother's health condition always makes me so gloomy. I could not be open. So it was not efficient. Well, I love opensource and I have some experiences. So I was assigned to do some open source projects for our products. Now here we have the them:

1. My manager called me to out of the opensource team for something else that I did not listened and not interested at that time. 2. He said this was his team and he was the only man can decide that no one could change.

I was a little shocked at first. And hated this then. But I could not change this. I knew the only way I changed this that I argued with him or leave. I knew at that time every body in our team had quarrelled with him. But I felt down at that time I could spare the energy to fight.

I made my mistakes. Not sure this was a mistake. I have no idea who things would went if I had a different choice. I chose to accept it even though I felt so bad. I could have choosen another blockchan startups.

So I had a bad 1.5 years work experience in my career. One interesting story:

My manager wants us to show our minds about team. Guys had their voices out and the summary sent to him, which were all agaist him. Can you image what he looked like?

He denied all the comments from guys. And continued to do as his will. Then 8 months later, our team was laid off, all but me. I had a health condition at that time.

It was a bad experience. I should not have hesitated. I should have called out my thoughts. Or just leave.

Life is short. Please stay happy and focus on the lovable things.

The first time I programed in mainframe, I suffered a lot. I am young. We young people at least myself is people programming from top to down, but you guys, old programmer programed from down to top. I mean from low level to high level of computer. Early days, people would have to learn hardware a lot to program. This is my impression.

That sounds great. People just is like the cassette/volumes, recording history, which is more vivid.

Very impressive experience.

I tried to google it. And two passages. The common point is "high-efficiency, built-in virtualization solution, as well as its ability to support massive enterprise-class workloads without requiring the type of massive infrastructure that you would need to do the same using x86 chips"

Power supports virtualization from chip level which looks excellent. But heard little that company would like to transfer to power from x86.

>I have never even heard of any company not already being an IBM account migrating to either of those systems.

If this is true, this line may be another reply to my question.

I love games and linux. But never play one in linux.