Let your type 2 go untreated and continue living your crappy life, and you'll develop type 1 as well. By exhausting your pancreas.
But yeah. Crappy article title.
18 karma · joined February 5, 2012
But yeah. Crappy article title.
I'd settle for a gdb backend, really. But printf-debugging is unacceptable.
## if
val = func()
if val: # standard form
code(val) # of if
## aif
aif(func, code) # not obvious that it does the same thing
# and limits you to using a function defined
# elsewhere, or Python's crippled one-line lambda.
;; regular when
(let (val (func))
(when val ; standard form
(func val))) ; of when
;; awhen
(awhen (func) ; standard form of
(func it) ; when, with added bound value
; possibly other
; code goes here
)
If you don't like magic, you could invent an awhen that took an extra parameter that designates the name to bind the result to, e.g. (awhen val test).
So.
Yes - you can achieve the same thing, as in any programming language that is Turing complete.
No - you cannot get the same syntax. And syntax affects readability and familiarity.
A very good way of thinking.
I'd prefer if they could be renamed to "Fetaure X which enables e.g. sublime minimap" and dito for autocomplete.
What is the standard you're talking about? Common Lisp? Scheme? Clojure? Emacs Lisp?
And CLOS is quite a good object system, actually.
I call on your "no need to rehash it here." Without even one good example, I'd say you're just trying to be elitist.
Get with the program: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KHTML
I've remapped left hand's home row to {[]} and QWE to ?() with a modifier.
Did not touch type when using QWERTY. Switched and learn it correctly. On the flip side, I have no idea where the keys are located if I try to do hunt-and-peck typing now.