Because it's a real word that is applied in this case.
17 karma · joined March 27, 2021
You can remove that freedom to the user. After all, the source is available, it can still be tested for malware, but your work won't be open-source.
Can somebody explain or link to an explanation on how UTF-8 allows for this?
On a PDP-11.
The one I'm interested in would be one, where viewing, modifying, recompiling the source is allowed, but redistribution is allowed only to those who had bought the license from all owners of the source and it's modifications. It would produce a nice "waterfall" effect.
It wouldn't be open-source nor free software, but most people don't really need limitless redistribution, and the source would be proof that said software isn't malicious.