118 karma · joined January 19, 2018
Now I run two swap partitions the size of physical memory on all machines. Turns out that after some weeks a good third of allocated ram lives in swap proving its usefulness .. and that its quick to turn the aux-swap partition into one for lvm snapshots and i suppose to act as part of the set to emulate'baloon files' too.
tl;dr; bad defaults. go with the size of physical ram and get suspend/hibernate/hybrid working and tested too.
use a 2nd ram-sized partition for snapshots/lvm and emergency space/lvm|zfs.
what do you think those are, and were they not always?
I meta-click to capture xterm output, call dired, make it give me popup-windows to edit short scripts and long command lines, i query the feed-reader, get my backup-schedule, have it popup for debrief when new voice notes are downloaded, serve as an emergency window manager, capture into multiple bins while browsing, turn into a presentation tool, create pdf reports and write-ups, prompt me to check-in any leftovers at the end of the day, work seamlessly across my machines, provide menus to give access to files, clickable functions, org-summaries, fantastic spreadsheets .. oh wait, that's going beyond shell.
so yes, it made my beard grey. big deal, i can shave. sure it not perfect, sure its infuriating, surely i'm insane for continually investing into my future while tweaking something to compound its benefits.
but none of this makes emacs anything but a lisp machine -- so well loved and so close to the metal that it will be here after you and me. Call it a general purpose computing shell, not an OS, and please compare it to the living, not the dead!
bingo. logical identities are not equivalencies in life.
this would get me to a point where i could inquire into the meaning of organize .. in this case probably realizing that there's sufficient self-organization that i'd have to think about needs/support and self-emerging structures.
at that point we could look at how the situation differs from the understanding implied in the question.
its only after i get my and the questioner's terms and models straight that i could begin to define some kind of scale to deal with someone's idea of best in order to work on generating 'deliverables'.
at least for me its best to become an expert in the things i want to change before suggesting changes in or to them; if i don't do that, or start from or with any kind of enthusiasm engendered by the power vested in me by big questions, good outcomes tend to move toward the vanishing point instead of forming solid new baselines.
but thats what you're suggesting the questioner do by having them question the use of the subjective term 'best'. right? :)
its freaky to think my parts, glands, organs were not freely and willingly coordinating by way of the cns.. and i have no experiential evidence .. in the amoeba and up .. that a brain is even needed for consciousness.
not with a single report. the overhead is maddening. much better to have 2..3..4 where you can put them to plan/discuss/evolve solutions while you just update and evolve checklists. debrief daily, use their work. be consistent, write your own daily summaries for upstream. going from 1 to 4 should ~double the time you need while making you much more productive/deliver more comprehensive skills & results at the same time. make sure you get paid for keeping things on track while doing your usual! p.s./edit: four is a great size. 2x5 is the most i'd want to do. coordinate with hr but stay out of it.
.. this is too weird for me.
sp332 on Dec 20, 2013 "Well you won't know which people have good ideas until they tell you their ideas :)"
this thing is a 5 year old specialist's setup and its not appropriate for new users, even the installation instructions have not aged well.
that didn't stop me from copying way to much of his work into my initial setup and crying about the mess i made when i got started though :) if you want to get started with org or that strange editor, consider yourself as having been trolled and look for something that has popup captures and does linked images not something this time/billing specific at first!
and 'protocol' is somehow going to make that better? I don't think that's possible. users have never had to think about more than paths.
lets give them semantics to map file-systems to applications, [perhaps] in the same way a functional package manager would 'give' you/the os access to the right versions of those applications.