I think the search engine space is very ripe for a startup, but duckduckgo isn't it IMHO.
121 karma · joined October 28, 2016
I think the search engine space is very ripe for a startup, but duckduckgo isn't it IMHO.
To a lot of people, paying for software is still a pretty weird concept, and evaluating the "worth" of software is quite hard when there is so much free software around.
How about teenagers who play with fireworks and die? Do we need to ban fireworks? Or do we just need parents to educate their children that fireworks are dangerous.
How many children are hospitalized/die from swallowing coins or lego?
Do we need warning labels on coins?
How many kids are hospitalized/die from swallowing batteries? I'd bet it's a lot more than magnets, and batteries can be pretty lethal.
So yes, I think we've gone too far.
And if your child (Lets say over the age of 3) is still eating random non-food items without checking with you, then you're not doing a great parenting job.
Don't you think the whole "put a warning sticker on everything" is getting a bit ridiculous?
People have been prosecuted and JAILED for reddit comments don't forget.
Let me ask a question. If it turned out that Google had started selectively "editing" peoples email coming from Gmail, would you still be fine using Gmail?
If a statement is absolutely fine if the person saying it is black, but absolutely offensive and racist if the person saying it is white, then it's the person taking offense who is the racist one...
Ah yes of course - racism can only be carried out by white men after all.
What a pile of rubbish. If you take offense at words, things are going to get progressively worse for you as more and more automated bots enter the scene.
The answer of course, is for people to stop taking offense.
Do these people get offended at spam emails suggesting they need viagra or a fuckbuddy? What's the point?
It's a static list of items. Hardly very efficient to load all that javascript, do a server request, just to display a list is it.
They were wrong on Brexit. They were wrong on Trump. Maybe once more countries have results like this the polsters and media will start actually engaging with real people.
This is just pointless syntax.
If you don't put them to death, can you be 100% sure saving that life isn't going to cause more people to die?
It's not simply a case of "punishment". It's preventing further crime and deaths.
The Dell XPS goes to sleep when lid closed, and correctly (and fast) wakeup when you open the lid. Battery life amazing as well. So I just shut the laptop, and open it the next day and continue...
If you put a serial killer to death, you can be 100% sure they won't kill any more people. If you put him in prison, you can't. He may escape, or he may get released early and kill again. Or as often happens, he'll kill other prisoners whilst in prison.
It's a question of whether you value potential victims, or potential falsely convicted innocent people. IMHO the former is a far bigger problem.