Not entirely correct, they have bevy_ui as the in-house example but many people use the third party bevy_egui crate
24 karma · joined September 2, 2023
Not entirely correct, they have bevy_ui as the in-house example but many people use the third party bevy_egui crate
My point is just that Cuban is supporting the problem that Musk is creating, albeit without putting himself entirely in a position where he could receive the ire of the public.
And just to reiterate, 18f has done great work, and if this is the only way for them to continue for the time being I guess so be it. I just don't agree with the chain of events that led here.
My issue comes from the fact that Cuban is then directly aiding and abetting the process that Musk is putting in place with DOGE, thus my concern.
With that in mind, asking "Well what would you do?" to justify the actions of putting a generally well regarded and good service into the hands of the private sector is a fundamental lack of scope on what's continuing to happen.
That doesn't surprise me and gives more evidence that Cuban is not dissimilar to Musk, just that he has much better PR.
What's even worse is that the app is incredibly poorly made such that occasionally some payments just fall into the void and either start the machine for free or require a double charge. Anytime I have reached out to complain about these I just get told to bring my phone closer to the machine.
We're building a set of apps that need to run on Linux, MacOS, and Windows so having a consistent solution for each is better than shell scripting and I personally have never felt great about make and it's weirdness.
It also helps that we have a pretty big monorepo so that anyone can bounce from one app to another and `just run` to use any of them, no matter the platform.
Either way the justification for me came from COSMIC[0].
[0] https://github.com/pop-os/cosmic-epoch/blob/master/justfile