329 karma · joined April 30, 2011
85% is already a quality number, saying relatively how much quality you are willing to give up for kilobytes in your output JPEG. Similarly, x264's CRF option is a quality number, saying how much quality you are willing to give up for bitrate.
Inevitably Beamr will produce some files that are inefficient, as well as some files that have noticeable banding and banding. The difference is CRF allows adjustments.
Unfortunately many utilities don't support SOCKS or have non-standard flags, so you would need a wrapping program like tsocks to force TCP through your proxy.
#include <iostream>https://github.com/micha/jsawk/ https://github.com/ddopson/underscore-cli
The context isn't clear if this means my OAuth credentials or my Facebook profile information but you shouldn't invite the question that the app owns my Facebook data or that they can access it when I'm not online.
For example, let's say people measure neuroticism exponentially, and an increase of one point means 10x perceived neuroticism. Because mean(log(x)) != log(mean(x)), the average won't be representative.
Everything else looks OK though: count, median, percentiles, a histogram.
I wouldn't be surprised to hear that Apple's Radar bug tracker had a few dozen bugs in Safari RSS, maybe even a potential DOS threat, and they chose to move on rather than allocating more resources to an unpopular feature.
This is misleading.
> Some Dropbox customer accounts were hacked too, but this was apparently an unrelated matter.
Unrelated how? What I read was: "Our investigation found that usernames and passwords recently stolen from other websites... A stolen password was also used to access an employee Dropbox account"
This article dangerously leaves the impression that an intrusion was made into Dropbox's system to access the employee's account, and possibly an admin interface. In reality Dropbox let a spammer with a valid email and password look at someone's files.
Using Haskell for any of the above components (especially the last three) could help make a browser that's more configurable and safer than anything Firefox Chrome or Safari could ever offer.