498 karma · joined June 20, 2022
You get some intuition for which methods to use, many structs have a pretty breadthy pallet, and then you can mostly just ignore it; quickly write your algorithm and let the compiler walk you through any oversights with the way you may have coded processing tasks.
Also helps to know that the docs support search by type signature since functions operate on or return owned, borrowed, or mutably borrowed, and generally just think of borrowed as a pointer for heuristic reasons.
It makes more sense than I do, usually.
yes, enables brevity.
yes, probably comprehensive offline std docs.
,...
https://perldoc.perl.org/perldiag should set off some alarms.
Another question is what is the interpretation of the output of an LLM generation when unprompted? Isn't that always effectively garbage when there's not a deliberate bias in the training set?
At that point, at least chaos theory is at play across the population of natural language, if not some expressed, but not yet considered truth.
This invalidates the subsequent claim about the functions which are convolved as well, I think all the GPUs might have something to say whether the bits changing the layers are random or correlated.
It's not nothing, but there's a lot of value stuck up in there, I mean, it's made out of people.
Real special, takes a lot of smart
Key multiplicity-controlled secondary end points included the percent change in AHI and body weight and changes in hypoxic burden, patient-reported sleep impairment and disturbance, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) concentration, and systolic blood pressure.
hmm... good?IEEE Professional Software Engineering Master
I haven't taken the exam, but started an online course, and it's been interesting.
Very textbook stuff, but towards a more succinct reference than lots of books about how software gets built. Not that formalism isn't important, I just haven't had a season of interest in it, particularly since it's so sparse and mostly without principles.
Makes lobbying over 50x more complicated.
The fact that a UK publication is on about it should be a clear signal that the authors are being influenced by an international interest would like to simplify the process.
Probably chipotle
Here's a page that lists like, a third of the state agencies, I guess, hope this helps! : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ministry_of_Labour
unless we're playing soccer / free-kicks, in which case, yeah, overengineer the hell out of it, sport.
ps, chapter 5 precisely specifies tolerances and minimums for things like latency of specific controls, for a control system for heavy machinery intended to be controlled by a human... and thanks for your input.
There's standards for control like MIL-STD-1472 which I'll bet this meets.
I'm sure none of them are "the highly redundant sensor fusion system with absurd levels of automation and sensing, the operator should not be able to notice any lag"
Consequences matter, so what is the consequence of having a screen that is just a bit too large?
- inadvertent swipes right, lands you on the Google Home page, but you can simply disable this or use a different launcher.
- can't fit as many thumb-addressable QS options, but Google-flavored android makes these larger, also provides one-handed mode gesture
- need to grip phone so that the corner extends beyond the palm of your hand, some phones have the camera on a lip that the index finger can use as a lip to hold
Obviously we're all ad supported entertainment focused media monsters so, screens aren't going to be smaller, you're just going to have to adapt
Unity has a pretty good debugger and graphical language.
Also somehow need to help develop tolerance for a great deal of thumbing through giant directories of names of things, skimming abstracts, and uncertainty in general.
Apple, Microsoft, Meta priced for modest growth.
Is this all information that should be communicated to a programmer, or is all this info something that should be automatically assessed by a compiler with clear responses automatically to all possible situations specified, black and white, in the code?
If so, if it is the responsibility of the compiler, why release a version of the language, stabilize a spec, where that's not the case?