583 karma · joined July 16, 2012
I understand that you can take ingredients replacements in account (as jalapeno, still keeping paprika recipes) but here it doesn't make sense anymore.
About Branding and Video Game History,it is a really smart move.
OAuth.io "OAuth-as-a-service" is also free for open source projects, by using directly the open source daemon oauthd for 80+ providers https://github.com/oauth-io/oauthd
disclosure : I work for OAuth.io
GPLv2 : You may copy, distribute and modify the software but you must relicense any changes and your entire project under GPLv2 and disclose all the source code
GPLv3 : You may copy, distribute and modify the software as long as you track changes/dates of in source files and keep modifications under GPL. You can distribute your application using a GPL library commercially, but you must also provide the source code
AGPL : The AGPL license differs from the other GNU licenses in that it was built for network software. You can distribute modified versions if you keep track of the changes and the date you made them. As per usual with GNU licenses, you must license derivatives under AGPL. It provides the same restrictions and freedoms as the GPLv3 but with an additional clause which makes it so that source code must be distributed along with web publication
The most restrictive for me for commercial use is GPLv2, because you have to open source ALL the project, not only the modified part. With GPLv3 and AGPL, just the modifications of the source code , not all the project. It is a question of point of view about "restrictions".
Webshell.io makes an unified Javascript API integration, authentication and scripting platform for web and mobile developers. The idea is to be the "jquery for APIs" for helping developers to build on top of APIs easily in a consistent ecosystem. We already make lots of evangelisation with apidays.io conferences worldwide (Paris, Madrid, San Francico) and with our blogs apijoy.tumblr.com and api500.com
Your job will be to inspire developers wolrdwide in participating AND organzing events, hackathons that helps dvelopers to build things with APIs.
Contact@webshell.io for more details. We can also meet us next June 21, 22, 23 at sf.apidays.io conference + hackday we organize in SF.
Marx thought that because machines (or robots) can produce lot more than humans and more effciently, a capitalist would replace little by little all humans workers by robots, with the benefits generated by the gain of productivity, for making more money and win the price competition... So the final society will have production only made by robots. It was partially true because he made the theory that these machines, well designed, cost less than hires hundreds humans with social rights, but he didn't expect that instead of replacing human by machines, we have found cheaper human work in China, or India for example, which is less efficient but cheaper at a large scale, when machines were too expaensive to invent or to maintain. New slave humans have replaced old slave humans protected now by social rights, and investments have been made to delocalisation not robotisation.
Neo-marxists believe that the society is not as Marx describe it as always a fight against classes, oppressed or exploited people against oppressor or exploitant people, but is divided in 3 strates. The INNOVATORS, the REPETITORS and the PARASITES.
Innovators are people which make the world move forward by their everyday work. Researchers, scientists, entrepreneurs, engineers, artists...
Repetitors are people which will not make the world move forward and change by their everyday work. These people are honorable, because they make repetitive stuff everyday to make the society run. It is your bus driver, your cloth seller, the nurse, the waiter at your restaurant etc...
So the innovators work depends exclusively of repetitors work. If nos buses, no farmers, the society falls down (see the Maslow pyramid of needs) and all the philosophers will come back to farm for eating. A funny question is : at which level of productity does we enable the apperance of a philosopher? It will be only when we'll have enough productivity to give resources to innovators just to innovate. Even be an entrepreneur ! If the repetitors were not there, you will not try to make your company. Think to all these repetitors thaht enable you to run your compaany, have employees coming at work, eating etc...
And parasites are people which slows the change, defined often by the cut of money they take of investment that make the workd change (Banks, even investors asking for dividends)
So they think that repetitors need to be and will be replaced by robots. Making repetitive things has no interest for humans, right? Humans are not work or energy like in Matrix...
Humans has to stay innovators, making the world move forward, exploiting always with more productivity the resources the earth provide and always try to better understand our world, with science, with art, with code.
Loking forward to see the robots coming in our everyday's life, enabling us to be really humans.
http://webshell.io/editor/thyb/ttsTweet
(you need to Github connect before to access his repo, then click on run, then Twitter connect of course for your own feed)
If you don't want signup or connect: You can also try directly the script in the console tour at the bottom of http://webshell.io homepage by copy pasting
fs.thyb.ttsTweet();