375 karma · joined December 5, 2008
The reason Flickr, Youtube, Wikipedia, etc are succesful because they could execute better than their competitors and that might not change by going back in time.
I started liking that language after going through that process a few times.
Tip: Try to read as slow as you can and don't miss any word/phrase. Look up dictionary if you need to.
Internet Explorer - 55.06% Firefox - 27.94% Chrome - 14.37% Safari - 1.23% Opera - 1.17% Mozilla - 0.13% Netscape - 0.02% BlackBerry9500 - 0.01%
My suggestion - Ask for minimum guarantee before you invest your time & effort doing it.
Your value system may be different from mine. If the advice doesn't make sense to you, move on, try something else..
Just because you don't agree doesn't mean you should down vote me...
In fact, you guys are proving my point.
How do you draw a line?
Relentless resourcefulness is the phrase.
I've had lot of success after sending intelligent comments to articles in mainstream media. Journalists respond back, more often than not.
It should be so insightful that they should feel that it would have been a better article had they spoken to you before writing it.
They don't have too much attention span. They don't care about how hard/easy it is do, or even if it is true or not. They just care about interesting stories...
For one of my stories I told them that we did some survey and just made up the findings. They loved it and published it next day without looking at my data or even asking me methodology of survey/research
What do they need money for?
I think Facebook/Digg would be vastly profitable if they didn't employ all those people. Do they need to?
Number of visitors are increasing 30-35% every month. Seems like good times to me.
Why don't you be the first one to offer term-sheets?
We had a joke in our company - 50% of zero revenue is zero. %age share doesn't matter in these deals...