mbetter

There is, it just isn't invoked for a .csv file.

As someone who basically lives in Excel for 40 hours a week, I find my quality of life to be much improved when I keep my text files tab delimited.

Lookups and if/then statements, wow. God forbid you ever have to audit a program with a loop.

You can't, actually. Use Pandoc.

Thank god that "regular people" are smart enough to not care what you think.

Anything of value, anyway.

> but the FSF/Richard Stallman doesn't the DWG library on the earlier version of their own open-source license.

I think they an important word.

I go for grey socks. You can wear grey with basically any pair of dress pants. With non-dress pants, I just don't wear socks.

CWWWWW we w W SSS Crrr rrrrrr vv sda Sdf

That means "more anything can mean anything descriptivist nonsense." Please let me know when your model has been adjusted.

Just remember that this is mega.co.nz and not mega.co.ns, the world's largest Lisp repository.

It can't be, no jokes are allowed on Hacker News.

CNet hasn't been a reputable download source for some time.

Everything that isn't a Star Wars reference in that response is fantastic and actually a little inspiring.

I can't get to the second page.

If Silicon Valley can't absorb the additional capital gains tax, why is it located in California?

This DCI stuff sounds like a quick way to make an app CPU-bound, if it wasn't already.

You could have just said that you don't understand what money is.

"Come over and get kicked in the nuts! Free car service and short lines!"

I'm not clever enough to write that "plain, sequential machine code" in a sufficiently correct fashion.

He gave concrete examples for all of his points, unlike you.

Gold is not money.

This isn't a strong case at all.

Detrimental to what?

No.

Listening to a Petersen Quartett performance right now, quite brilliant.

If taxation is theft, property is theft. Or in other words: what gives you the right to compel me to defend your property?

You may want to take direct moral responsibility for your circumstances, but that would be very dishonest. Whether you like it or not, you are part of a society and the very existence of society makes your circumstances possible.

Because having a simple and logically consistent system to decide what is right and wrong in any given situation absolves one of the responsibility to make complicated moral decisions on their own merits.

I understand libertarianism and I very much appreciate that it is built on a foundation of reason. However, being an imperfect being, a wise man tempers his reason with empiricism.

He may wear a kilt, but he doesn't play the bagpipes, so he's no true Scotsman.

> why do you think it's a bad idea to argue with a libertarian?

Every time I argue with a libertarian, it's an endless series of "No True Scotsman" arguments.

My thoughts, yet expressed more eloquently than I ever could.

Would you happen to have an opinion on which of your books I should read first?