> why do you think it's a bad idea to argue with a libertarian?
Every time I argue with a libertarian, it's an endless series of "No True Scotsman" arguments.
Every time I argue with a libertarian, it's an endless series of "No True Scotsman" arguments.
See how that works? "Your argument doesn't accurately represent my viewpoint" is what both No True Scotsman and straw men are about. So rather than opting out of an argument by calling "logical fallacy" on someone, why not clear up the definitions and be sure of what each other are talking about?