> Since facebook isn't going to change licence anytime soon, how long before JS community comes up with a truly "open source" create-react-app?
Kind of confused what you mean, as I understand it both react and the boiler are open source, but facebook has this policy which apparently means they can revoke access if they want.. Anyway if this is the issue then your question is really about alternatives to react, which there are certainly a few of.
"Your time is worth more than 50 an hour" ... Uh ... Is that really something you can say so confidently. And if 50 dollars for one hour, can you really say that "fixing yoyr problem" is 50? Which is it, project or time based?
I dont particularly care whether or not its faster than vue or react. If I'm going to build a heavy use production app I would use one of those just because it has so much of a community supporting it. But sometimes less is more. The api here is simple, and yes similar to vue and react. The guts of the docs took like 5 minutes to read through. Over time, the novel concepts introduced by these frameworks turn into general best practices. That's what we see here. A boiling down of the reactive web framework into a small set of core methods. Certainly not the most powerful or extensible. But perhaps the most simple.
Yeah its really ridiculous how quickly people focus on gamification, like if you have a marginally functional product just gamify it as much as possible and people are into that.
I remember seeing this guy playing "point and click" games, and they looked so pointless...
Maybe the original post was a little racist. But it was to a far less degree of intensity than the messages she received. If a white person tweeted "I cant walk through this black hood I'm gonna get shot!" and a black person responded "kill yourself you inferior genetic third world white" that would be over the top too. The other commenters should stop making false equivalence.
I grew up here, it was a very ideal place for families. More suburban than sf (population of less than 5k) but didnt feel like sprawl either. We played in the streets, can't do that in most of sf. Although to be fair this area theyre talking about isnt really in brisbane anyway, its on a industrial stretch.
Not saying everything the article says is wrong, but some of the comparisons are really off the mark. Vue and React are front end frameworks. They don't replace Rails; they can be used together. Node has many benefits but its not really better for single page apps. In general this article the purposes of front and back end tools. Also, even though there are increasingly more node positions, ruby and rails still have a large number of job postings.
Is this different from the linux subsystem microsoft already supports? Which is nice, and would,be worthwhile if i had enough motivation to use windows gui programs, but is limited given that you have to jump through an extra hoop to run linux gui programs, and cant even access your linux partitions from it
If you quote the fact that coffeescript has significant whitespace, list comprehension and then in response say that javascript has HoF and iteration protocol, it does sound like youre trying to counter the point, so it seems like for someone to bring up the fact that they are not identical is fair game.
Whether or not bracket free code is more readible might be a personal opinion. I think for people who understand Coffeesctipt well, its easier because theres less visual noise. There are many languages with optional parens, and whether or not you want to stretch the ability of the parser is up to you. Coffeescript proves that they are not necessary in order to write javascript.
You might not feel like you wrote too many brackets, but good luck convincing someone who uses none (except for hashes) that they should start. Coffeescript code is not sloppier, its more terse.