11 karma · joined October 11, 2022
I wonder how you come you opted for GLM; how did the selection process look like?
> When the user's proposed solution is bad, replace it with a better one
When the user's proposed solution can be improved upon or modified due to some critical missing information, suggest a revised plan and prompt the user for how to proceed.
Furthermore, an existing kanban (ticket) workflow will expect you to refine the context into something more ... concentrated, or at least something that we are used to seeing as developers working with tickets, at least more so than the chat history that seem to be favored.
Have you put any thought into how this would integrate into such a process?
What I'm curious about and something I'm struggling with myself: are you feeling that the productive uplift of offloading work to an LLM limits the gain of managing a second brain like this?
I can see the PARA structure and perhaps a bit of Zettelkasten in the peripheral (but that might be my own bias).
I'm using a similar system (here's a link) https://blog.hampusadamsson.com/blog/How%20I%20Manage%20Note...
And also a custom plugin to do parts of the LLM (here's another shameless link) lifting: https://github.com/hampusadamsson/modai