HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

matterofact

0 karma · joined February 5, 2016

submissionscomments
matterofact··on [dead]
Well, if you replace welfare with jobs, most would agree it's a positive more. Major conglomerates will not go for this, so it becomes a low cost financing for main-street and small to mid size manufactures. I doubt any currently available goods will be effected, price wise because it'd be less that 1/1000 of the products in any given space. It would encourage continued energy product, of all kinds, here in the USA.

"You have to argue that the gain of manufacturing jobs will be worth more than the loss of inexpensive manufactured goods. The market currently says that argument is false"

Huh? Wrong. Nothing currently being manufactured would be effected until thousands of new manufacturing plant are brought (back?) online here in the USA. Your you must prove your idealized statement is valid by your metrics; and it is not.

matterofact··on [dead]
I just read the 'approach to comments' and the 'official guidelines'. If you think this post has a problem, maybe you should explicitly point it out. Most of the electorate understand we need jobs, particularly higher paying technical jobs, here in American. Calling out a politician for anti-American ideas is not with the bounds of HN, or are you just expressing personal bias? Surely the $10/bbl is a grossly stupid idea, no?