783 karma · joined June 7, 2012
I find it perplexing. I agree with Tim. This could be done well. The UK Govs Digital Services Department have done fine work in recent years. I have faith in them to pull something like this off well.
Next though, we need an actual tech spec and public technical consultation. Then perhaps we can have a meaningful debate on it.
1bn a day is order 10k/s. if you the creator of Sidekiq know "dozens" of people hitting that rates, if anything you're supporting arcticfox's point that these systems are quite rare.
No shade intended. I have been a very grateful Sidekiq Enterprise customer in past Ruby jobs.
I think your checklist of characteristics frames things well. it reminds me of Remix's introduction to the library
https://remix.run/docs/en/main/discussion/introduction > Building a plain HTML form and server-side handler in a back-end heavy web framework is just as easy to do as it is in Remix. But as soon as you want to cross over into an experience with animated validation messages, focus management, and pending UI, it requires a fundamental change in the code. Typically, people build an API route and then bring in a splash of client-side JavaScript to connect the two. With Remix, you simply add some code around the existing "server side view" without changing how it works fundamentally
it was this argument (and a lot of playing around with challengers like htmx and JSX like syntax for Python / Go) that has brought me round to the idea that RSCs or something similar might well be the way to go.
Bit of a shame seeing how poor some of the engagement has been on here and Reddit though. I thought the structure and length of the article was justified and helpful. Concerning how many peoples' responses are quite clearly covered in TFA they didn't read...
I find it amusing that they've decided to refer to this as masonry layout. If you actually built a wall like this (as opposed to uniformly-sized rows, without any columns) it would be a structural engineering disaster.
That sounds like more of a criticism of large PRs and long feedback cycles than of code review itself.
Sounds plenty plant-based to me. Why conflate plant-based with healthy? Plenty of people, myself included, have turned to meat-alternatives to reduce our environmental impact. I am under no illusions that it is healthy for me!
You can fry potatoes in a vat of vegetable oil, or you can cook skinless chicken breast in boiling water. Using plant content as a proxy for health makes no sense.
though I do miss the giant packs you get in the US, all pills come in small blister packs with purchase limits in all shops, to make overdosing more difficult
We use Stitch at the moment and have found this to be a surprisingly hard problem to solve without binary log replication, and without full refreshes. For the moment we've ruled out binlogs as we use Aurora MySQL which requires you to binlog from the master, and tying my data warehouse replication to the master node concerns me.
In incremental mode, for common DBs e.g. MySQL / Postgres, will Airbyte pick up hard deletions ever?
> Public Health England's 2015 independent evidence review found that, based on the available evidence, vaping is around 95% less harmful than smoking. The Royal College of Physicians came to a similar conclusion in its 2016 report 'Nicotine without smoke: tobacco harm reduction'.
Tech stack: Ruby, Rails, React, GraphQL, MySQL, Postgres, AWS
Caring.com, based in San Mateo, CA, helps customers around the US navigate senior care options in their area, and find the best fit for their families' unique needs.
We are seeking a REMOTE Senior Engineer with a solid Ruby / Rails background, and an ONSITE VP of Engineering, to join our product team. This team focuses on internal web tools including our custom CRM, callcenter software, ML powered predictive search, and lead auction platform.
Our industry may be old fashioned but our engineering department certainly isn't!
Must be willing to overlap with US Pacific Time business hours.
Apply at https://www.caring.com/about/jobs/
Reduce, reuse, recycle. In that order
You can't just drop an argument destroying bomb like this with no citation
I don't think eating less meat is impractical, certainly not specifically just eating less beef, by far the most environmentally impactful one.
https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetary-policy/inflation/in...