matt3210

People keep forgetting to ask if they”should” build something before building it. Yeah the tokens are cheap but even though it only takes 3 months instead of a year is still expensive.

Why not just offer an AWS compatible cloud service at this point ... can you copyright an API?

Naming the agent "OPEN_AI_AGENT" definitely means it was open ai :stare:

And here we are… AI is Going to end all humans.

How does anthropic know what they were doing?

Net neutrality anyone? If AI is critical to getting work done in the modern era, its access should be guaranteed. Anyone banned from accessing frontier AI is being forcibly left behind. This includes distillation.

Distillation is fair use

I bet we'll find that its openAI agent benchmarks off on their own again

Just hold the people who make mistakes with AI accountable to those mistakes and the market will naturally slow as people become cautious.

The big boys in AI want a moat now that they have the market

These'll be part of the training set eventually.

If you define what you want in typescript by updating existing typescript wordage, you get what you want exactly as specified, with minimal token cost and no ip theft.

If they weren't doing something wrong, they'd answer with a firm "no we're not doing anything wrong" but they only give non-answers.

I'm concerned that a huge portion people in my industry actively push for a future which I have no value to society (fully replaced by AI), and my family will suffer greatly by it.

Distillation is fair use

> ask challenging questions

As far as I can tell, it's still not possible for an agent to reliably determine if a question is a good question. That means the test part of the loop cant be fulfilled.

Hunting an animal would be considered ok by most, but scaling it to the point of damage is not ok according to most.

Look at openAIs history, they clearly have no idea what the agents are doing.

> "While unlikely, we cannot rule out that de-identified data derived from their usage of our products helped improve our models "

Ah yes, taking code from a person/company is fine if its deidentified!

Agreeing to partially credit is an admission that they used his work.

When do operators become responsible for what their agents do? "The AI did it" should not be a valid defense. An Agent action should be treated as the actions of the person or company who pays for the inference.

OpenAI doesn't even know what agents are doing during benchmarks. They're constantly hacking or communicating. They probably just can't answer the question on if user data was used.

Anything other then "we did not access your data or train on your data" is a MASSIVE RED FLAG.

Is this higher than the general public?

We should stop pretending this was anything other than institutional power being used to suppress a competitor to xAI

What a coincidence, Anthropic getting handicapped so xAI can try to catch up

I guess current AI, IS the best it will ever be

They have stock in nvidia

Why not playwright and google ai mode or ai search header?

AI mistakes are due to pure laziness and incompetence that appears well done. There’s a big difference between that and a genuine mistake from a knowledgeable person.