mathgradthrow

This seems like an object lesson in making sure that the right hand does not know what the left is doing. Yes, if you have two departments working on two mutually exclusive architectures, one of them will necessarily fail. In exchange, however, you can guarantee that it will be the worse one. This is undervalued as a principle since the wasted labor is more easily measured, and therefore decision making is biased towards it.

No, it doesn't.

If there is a tacit admission of such a thing, it's not in the quote you provided.

Anyone can just kill you whenever they want. Security cannot be granted by cryptography, only secrecy.

when people are botroing like crazy, it means that interest rates are too low.

Clickbait, there is no life on earth!

Every male on earth looked at pornography as a child. Any problem it creates is literally as bad as it can possibly be.

You also don't have a control group, and social media is a much better guess for whats wrong with men anyway.

Basically all of the hyper masculine bullshit aimed at children advises them to not consume pornography.

This is just fear-mongering.

Its a good thing that cryptocurrency transactions are easy to reverse.

pornography does not harm children.

Of course they didn't. It's just funny.

Seems like a pretty strong argument.

There is no substitute for writing correct programs, no matter how hard it is. If you want correct programs you have to write them correctly.

Monotone just means order preserving. f is monotone if f(a) >= f(b) whenever a >= b.

Tome to move to Tor

the lack of cryptogrifting.

in the article it asserts that the farmers didn't know the effects of lead chromate on human health, they were just "expanding their business".

I guess since it's just fraud and negligence, we should forgive it?

how the hell do you beam neutrons?

I can't read substack on my phone, so I can't see the article, but the correct statement that is closest to what you have written is just that d is any real number satisfying this inequality. We define a subset U of AxBxR by

U={(a,b,x):x>|a-b|^2}

and then were looking for the infimum of (the image of) U under the third coordinate function

d(a,b,x)=x

That's ridiculous, this is a discussion abour taste. It will obviously depend on your taste.

obviously the difference is between the artistic merit of MLP and discworld.

they were sprinting covertly. Thats why this happened.

it seems to be a pretty safe place to be mossad.

It has also been a disaster in the US, to be fair.

the average human is good at something, and sucks at almost everything. Human performance at chess and average performance at chess differ by 7 orders of magnitude.

What on earth do you mean by prove, If not within a system of proof?

You can prove the consistency of PBA, But you cannot prove that you cannot prove the inconsistency of PBA, because The inability to do both is the definition of consistency in the larger system.

Maybe DFW wasn't as smart as he thought he was.

honestly refreshing take.

you cannot prove the consistency of a system of proof within that system, ie at all.

the maypole group is indeed a subgroup of a braid group. juat add the pole itself as the rightmost strand.

can we ban slam as a headline word?